In Quebec, two sets of cannabis rules exist: one conservative, one liberal. Which will prevail?

Close to 100 years of cannabis prohibition in Canada ends today. In Quebec, though, this newfound freedom will be enjoyed unevenly.

Whether you're able to fire up a joint depends largely on where you happen liveand what kind of property you can afford.

Some municipalities, like Quebec City, have opted for more restrictive, more conservative regulations on marijuana use.

Others, like Montreal, are taking a more liberal approach, imposing fewer limits on where cannabis can be consumed.

So as the new law comes into effect, there are basically two parallelbut different regimes in the province.

Some places will be governed by rules influenced bypopular concerns, while in other places, guidelines inspired by public health experts will prevail.

It's not clear how long this duality will exist. The incoming Coalition Avenir Qubec government has signalled it wants to tie the whole province to more restrictive rules.

But before itcan do so, Quebecers will have the chance to witness the two different models at workand evaluate which they think works best.

Hardliners and hippies

The patchwork of rules and regulations governingcannabis use in Quebec is the result of a serious round of buck-passing.

While the federal government made the initial decision to legalize marijuana, it was left to the provinces to decide how to implement the new law.

Quebec's legislation, in turn, gave municipal governments the freedom to put in placetheir own rules on where people can and can't consume.

Not surprisingly, different cities are taking different approaches. Quebec City, Saguenay and Sherbrooke, for example, have banned its use in public.

In Montreal and Gatineau, on the other hand, you're now allowed to smoke dope in a park.

But even within cities, there can be different rules depending on what street you happen to find yourself on.

The Montreal boroughs controlled by the opposition at city hall,Ensemble Montral, all plan on passing bylaws prohibiting smoking in public spaces, including parks.

And while no public consumption is allowed in Quebec City, that doesn't apply to the campus of Universit Laval, where students will be allowed to eat but not smoke cannabis.

Complicating matters further: property owners, too, are free to set their own rules. As a result, landlordsare increasingly moving to prohibit consumption in their rental units.

That means ifyou rent property in, say, the Montreal borough of Saint-Laurent, governed by Ensemble Montral,it'll be tough finding a spot close to home where you can enjoy the benefits of legalized weed.

Reefer madness?

Over the past several weeks, public health officials in Quebec have been encouraging municipalities to adopt amore liberal approach.

They have raised concerns that by banning marijuana use in public or in rented properties, more vulnerable segments of the population will be exposed to punishment, while the more affluent won't be.

That would undo one of the main arguments for legalizing cannabis in the first place, which was to avoid criminalizing a relatively harmless activity.

Quebec's public health officials have also argued it doesn't make sense to base restrictions on the public use of cannabis on existing regulations surrounding alcoholoften cited as the justification for keeping it out of parks.

"Unlike alcohol, cannabis doesn't lead to violence or crime (if we exclude trafficking a narcotic)," Dr. Mylne Drouin, the regional director of public health on the island of Montreal,said in an open letter last month to local mayors.

But public health authorities in the provinceare meeting with stiff resistance from municipalpoliticians sensitive to their constituents' concerns.

A long list of large Quebec municipalities have ignored the public health warnings and pressed ahead with a conservative approach to cannabis.

"We found that the legalization of cannabis is greatly worrying our citizens," said Alan DeSousa,mayor of Saint-Laurent borough,last week as he announced his intention to ban the public use of marijuana.

DeSousa said he had received several comments from anxious parents. He even cited the hypothetical example of an elderly person having to share a park bench with stoners.

"It's better to start with a more restrictive framework that we can then change later," he said.

My province, right or left?

Proponents of the conservative approach are likely to get support from the new provincial government.

The CAQ campaigned on a promise to raise the minimum age for cannabis consumption from 18 to 21, as well as toprohibitits use in public.

Shortly after winning the election, the party's transition teamindicated the new governmentwould make good on that promise as quickly as possible.

But amending the existing legislation will take several months, at least. That gives advocates of the public-health argument more time to build their case.

Premier-designate Franois Legault only officially takes charge tomorrow. Already his tenure looks set to be marked by a series of culture wars, as opinions grow polarized over immigration and identity issues.

How cannabis is regulated will be another front in this war.

It is one of a suite of new issues confronting Quebecers that will determine which way the province's values lean.