Quebec government seeks to make flood compensation process 'more fair'
Government to tweak housing evaluations, allow collective applications for exemptions from rebuilding rules
There may be good news on the horizon for some flood victims who were told they wouldn't be allowed to rebuild.
On Wednesday, the Quebec governmentannounced changesto its plan to manage reconstruction of homes damaged by this spring's flooding.
Going forward, the government will offer municipalities the ability to apply for a collective exemption to reconstruction limitations.
A total of 211 of these zones,defined as vulnerable to flooding every zeroto 20years,were identified across the province. They are subject to a government order forbidding all new construction and severely restricting the rebuilding of damaged houses.
Public Security Minister MartinCoiteuxsaidthatthis change was made to prevent entire neighbourhoods from being suddenly depopulated and would make the whole process "more fair" for homeowners.
Another change concerns the valuation of properties.
The valuation will now take into account the value of land as well as the value ofthe house to account for cases where a less valuable building may standon a more valuable piece of property.
The government will also now base its valuation of whethera home isdamaged by more than 50 per cent of its total value on the cost of new construction, noton municipal valuations.
- Homeowners promised flood inspection reports in next 5 weeks
- Frustrations come to the fore atPointe-Clairepublic consultation on spring floods
Last week, he announced that the governmentwould be ramping up its efforts to process home inspection reports and release compensation packages.
Coiteuxpromised that more staff would be hired andhomeowners whose properties had been inspected wouldreceive their report within five weeks.
In mid-May, the Liberal government increased the amount of moneyQuebecerscan receive in compensation for damage to their flooded homes to a maximum of$200,000.
That amount doesn't include money for movable objects, living expenses and measures undertaken by residents to protect their homes, all of which are subject to different maximums.
'This is not a house, it's a home'
"I'm willing to pay for it myself.Idon'teven want the tax dollars," saidMichaelGurard. "All we want is to have our home."
He said they've never seen a drop of water in 36 years living in the same house. As a result of thespring flooding,their basement was badly damaged.
"We lost everything in the basement," saidGurard, holding his wife Debbie Pizzuto. "Even her wedding dress."
The couple is worried they won't be allowed to rebuild based on the government's existing plan.
"The evaluation of this sector is low. The evaluation of houses arelow because we have no services, we have no water, we have no sewers," he said.
Gurardsays all he wants isto rebuild and go back to normal.
"We don't want to be expropriated," he said. "This is not a house, it's a home."
"Our children were brought up here," added Pizzuto. "This is where I want to die. This is my place."
With files from Steve Rukavina