Confusion, anger over Montreal's handling of pit bull permits

Confusion abounds over a form letter the City of Montreal is sending to hundreds pit bull owners, informing them that their applications for the special permit required to keep their dogs are incomplete.

The letters say while they have received the person's application, the file is incomplete. It is unclear when they started being sent out.

[The city] gave me the licence, I have the tag and I have the permit, and now you want to keep my dog after you took my money?- Pit bull owner Thomas Pavia

Under thebylaw, pit bull owners had until March 31 to apply for the permit and until June 1 to provide all the necessary documents to support their application.

The letter says the city is giving ownersfour weeks to give the dog to someone who lives in a municipality that allows pit bulls or to a shelter, and to fill out a form attesting that the dog is no longer in the person's possession. No contact information is provided.

It threatens legal action and the seizure of the dog if they do not adhere to the requirements.

• Mayor Denis Coderre says his priority is to protect people, not dogs

City gave no warning, says SPCA

SophieGaillard,a lawyer with the MontrealSPCA'sanimal advocacy department, said they're expecting a lot of calls from people who don't know what to do.

She's not sure the shelter will be able to handle an influx of dogs, if it comes to that.

Gaillard said while the SPCA's relationship with the city is tense, they are still providing services to certain boroughs that are not related to the city's breed-specific legislation, which went into effect last December.

• Confusion and frustration as Montrealers try to register pit bulls ahead of deadline
• Montreal SPCA to end dog control services in protest of pit bull bylaw

"We should have been warned or given some kind of heads up before these letters came out," she said.

In an emailed statement, city spokespersonGonzalo Nunez said the letters were sent out after a "rigorous analysis" of each file.

He said before sending the letters, city employees contacted those affected and let them know what information was missing from their applications.

Those who believe they mistakenly received the letter can contact with the city and indicate what they think the error is, he said.

The city ombudsman's office released a statement Thursday, saying it has received several complaints about the letter. The office says it can't change city rules, but it can see that theyare applied fairly.

'I tried to be honest'

Thomas Pavia lives in Saint-Henri with his 10-year-old pitbull, Ezec.

Last fall, when the bylaw was first announced, he brought in all the papers he was told were needed to get the special permit, filled out the forms and paid the $150 fee.

He was told the city didn't know when the bylaw would actually come into effect, so his money was refunded. Once it came into effect last December, he had to redo his application.

He received the tag for his dog this winter. So when he received the letter from the city earlier this week, he was confused. And angry.

"My dog has arthritis now, he cannot run like crazy, he never bites anybody, so I'm really pissed off because I followed the rules and I tried to be honest," he said.

Pavia said he's not sure if he mistakenly received the letter, but he isn't planning on reaching out to the city to clarify. He said the process to get the permit was frustrating and he's not interested in dealing with the city anymore.

"The question is what arethey going to do? You gave me the licence, I have the tag and I have the permit, and now you want to keep my dog after you took my money?"

He said he will go to court if he has to.

Quebec-wide ban?

Earlier this week, politiciansin the South Shore municipality of Chteauguay voted to scrap its pit bull ban and focus instead on dangerous dogs.

Mayor Nathalie Simon said the ban was overturned after nearly 30 years because it was difficult toenforce.

"It was not working at all," she told CBC Montreal'sDaybreak."We were in front of the judge and in court all the time, we were losing.

"And on top of that it'snonsense for us to just target a breed."

Public Security Minister Martin Coiteux tabled the province's dangerous dog legislation in April, after months of delays.

The proposed law, Bill 128, is the beginning of what Coiteux called a "gradual" approach to legislating dangerous dogs.

His plan, he said at the time, is to eventually ban pit bulls across the province.

• Quebec to eventually ban pit bulls, public security minister says

On Thursday, in response to questions about Chteauguay's decision to ditch its pit bull ban,Coiteux said the government is trying to establish a base of the required rules and regulations throughout the province, but that the cities will implement their own specific rules and have their own regulations.

Coiteux'sbillhas not yet been adopted it still has to go through consultation period and the committee stage, where it will be studied.

• What Canadian cities have learned from pit bull bans