Quebec coroner 'uncomfortable' with Arruda's answers about pandemic preparedness in care homes

The coroner overseeing an inquiryinto COVID-19 deaths in seniors' residences in Quebec last year questioned some of the responses from the province's top public health official on Monday.

Dr. Horacio Arruda, Quebec's public health director, is the highest-ranking public official to testify at the inquiry so far, and during his two days of testimony he was forced to defend many of the government's decisions in preparing for the first wave of the pandemic.

Arruda testified Monday that his department, when planning for the pandemic, had internal discussions about the possible risks COVID-19 might pose to seniors in long-term care residences (CHSLDs) as early asJanuary and February of 2020.

Coroner GhaneKameltold Arruda Monday that she was surprised to hear that, considering that all testimony at the inquiry to this point suggested that there was almost "no planning"for pandemic response in CHSLDs in the early months of that year.

"It's a bit troubling what you're saying," Kamel said.

She noted that when the pandemic hit, it wasclear there wasn't enough staff, personal protective equipment or training in CHSLDs and that they were "anything but ready"for the pandemic.

Kamel said she was "really uncomfortable"with Arruda'sresponses.

Nearly 4,000 people died in long-term care homes in the first wave of the pandemic that spring.

Arruda noted that his department sent a COVID-19preparation guide to CHSLDs on March 12, and that he took quick action to curtail infections bybanning visitors later that month.

But he admitted that the thousands of deaths in CHSLDs during the first wave "raises questions"about planning and how resources were distributed.

Patrick Martin-Mnard, a lawyer for the families of some of the residents who died, asked Arruda if seniors' residences were "a blind spot"in pandemic planning.

"It depends how you interpret the term 'blind spot,'" Arruda responded.

A 'mad house'

After Arruda's testimony concluded, Martin-Mnardtold reporters that what he heard wasunsatisfying.

Martin-Mnardnoted that at several points during his testimony,Arrudaresponded by saying certain things didn't fall under his responsibility, or that other witnesses would be better placed to respond.

"What emerges a lot from Dr. Arruda's testimony, and from other witnesses' testimony, is that it's very difficult to know who decided what, when," Martin-Mnard said.

"It's a little bit like a madhouse," he said.

Arruda's testimony sets the stage for the testimony Wednesday of former health minister Danielle McCann, the first and only elected official scheduled to testify at the inquiry.

Initially Marguerite Blais, the minister responsible for seniors, was to testify, but McCann was asked to take her place when Blaiswent on sick leave last month.

The inquiry Monday was also scheduled to hear from two assistant deputy ministers who were heavily involved in pandemic planning,Dr. Lucie Opatrnyand Nathalie Rosebush.