Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Montreal

Shape up or lose your property, Quebec City tells owners of neglected buildings

While Quebec City threatens to expropriate a handful of properties, one legal expert says both that city and Montreal have been slow to deal with buildings that are either at risk, neglected or abandoned.

Legal expert says both Quebec City and Montreal could do more to protect heritage properties

The 'little white house' of the Plains of Abraham, 137 years old, was ground zero for a fight between developers and conservationists. (Radio-Canada)

It's known in Quebec Cityas "the little white house" atiny 139-year-old building thatfaces the city's historic Plains of Abraham and istucked next to a Martello tower where British soldiers once stood guard.

Once a picture of tranquillity, the house became ground zero this summer in a battle between developers and the city's historic-building aficionados.

Amid concerns for the future of the little white house, the city threatened to expropriate the property from the developer.

But one expert in municipal law says both Quebec City and Montreal are generallyslow to deal with buildings that are either at risk, neglectedor abandoned.

According toFranoisMarchand,Quebec's two biggest cities don't seem to realize the legal powers they have to deal with these buildings.

Construction material in the little white house's yard has been the subject of neighbourhood complaints. (Courtesy of Diane Ct.)

The sad decline of the little white house

Neighbours began to rally around the little white house after its owner, developer StphaneHuot, started using it as an office for a nearby construction site.

Huot's company razed the bushes and grass on the front lawn, and left rebar, blocks of cement and other building materials scattered in its place. A stack of lumber lay on the sill of its delicately paned front window.

"There was a magnificent yard with very beautiful trees,"said neighbourAlainPerron."But since the first of June, it was completely destroyed."

About 30 people who live nearby, concerned aboutHuot'streatment of the building,started pushing for the city to list it as a heritage property.

In 2013, Huotwanted to demolish the home to make way for a condominium tower. The city blocked that move.

Municipal law attorney and potential mayoral candidate Franois Marchand says cities have the power to fix up, demolish or protect homes. (Radio-Canada)

Fix it or lose it

Mayor Regis Labeaumethreatened to expropriate the little white house, along with four other properties, in order to protect them from developers.

Labeaume claimed special zoning laws for the area around the National Assembly could have been invoked, and that theywould have left the property owners with little recourse.

The next dayHuot's company, Groupe Huot, promisedthe construction office would be relocated and that the little white house would be preserved.

ButMarchand, amunicipal law attorney and former city councillor, saysLabeaume'sbluster was unnecessary.

"I think they already have all the necessary tools," saidMarchand, who is also considering running for mayor in the next municipal election.

He believesQuebec City should go to court instead of seeking to givebuildings protected status,a processhe says could take months.

Montreal property woes

Montreal is nursing its own property headaches.Two greystone buildings on de l'Esplanade Avenue were declared unsafe in 1996, but have continued to deteriorate.

The PlateauMont-Royal borough considered expropriating them, but oppositioncouncillor Alex Norris said the city's legal department advised against it.

The address at 4423 de l'Esplanade Avenue in Montreal and its mirror-image greystone next door were once stately homes but have been derelict for nearly four decades. (CBC)

Expropriation is usually done because it's in the public interest. The city's director general concluded that it mightbe hard to make such a case if the buildings weregoing to be converted into private condominiums, said Norris.

Instead, the boroughlaunched injunction proceedings three years ago, which are still pending.

"What this whole sad story shows is that cities in Quebec, and particularly the City of Montreal,do not have the powers they need when faced with extreme cases of negligence and abandonment of buildings," Norris said.

"I believe the City of Montreal should have the power to simply seize a building that is abandoned for a certain amount of time with no compensation to the owner," he said, adding that such powers would scare a lot of negligent property owners into fixing up their buildings.

Smaller towns do it

Marchand said Quebec courts are often willing to empower smaller municipalities to deal with problematic properties, and that should work for the province's big cities, too.

"I am a lawyer in municipal [law], and I have seen many small towns or municipalities go in court andwin," he said.

As examples, he points to Coaticook, in the Eastern Townships, and Rivire-Bleue, near Rivire-du-Loup.

Both municipalities obtained court rulings that not only forced building owners to repair their properties within a set time period, but also granted the municipalities the power to do the repair work themselves and send the owners the bill.

"If small towns win in court, Quebec and Montreal should also," Marchand said.

"We have problems with very,very beautiful buildings thatneed urgent renovation work and nobody acts," he added.

Corrections

  • A previous version of this story said the City of Montreal was concerned a judge would not approve an expropriation request if the building was to be demolished afterwards. In fact, the concern was over being able to convince a judge that expropriating the building was in the public interest if it was going to be converted into private condominiums.
    Sep 30, 2016 4:29 PM ET

With files from Radio-Canada