Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Montreal

Protesting police in camo pants could face big fines under new Quebec bill

Quebec's Public Security Minister tabled a bill Thursday to force police officers to wear their full regular uniform. Police have worn camouflage and other colourful pants for three years to protest against government pension reform bill.

Police unions decry bill, saying they are disappointed by Quebec's decision

Officers in Quebec have worn camouflage and other colourful pants as a form of protest since 2014. (Radio-Canada)

Police officers across Quebec will face hefty fines if they refuse to wear their full uniforms under a long-promised bill tabled today byPublic Security Minister Martin Coiteux.

Bill 133 is the Quebec government's effort to force officers to ditch the camouflagepants they have been wearing as a form of protest since 2014,when PhilippeCouillard'sLiberal government introduced municipal pension reform.

Coiteuxcalled the camo pant pressure tactic "unacceptable."

Fines for refusing to comply with the legislation range from $500 to $3,000 per day. Fines doublefor repeat offenders.Under the new bill, the director of a police force also has to report anyincident to theDirector of Criminal and Penal Prosecutions.

"What this bill proposes, what it states is that not wearing the regular uniform is not an appropriate, not a legitimate way of protesting," said Coiteux on Thursday.

Montreal police chief Philippe Pichet wouldn't comment on how the bill could impact ongoing negotiations between police forces and the government, but said the decision will strengthenthe public's confidence in officers.

"I think that, iftomorrow morning, all the police officers in Montreal are in uniform, that it won't change the excellent work they've been doing up until now," he told Radio-Canada."But the perception from citizens concerning the police service would bebetter."

Patience wearing thin

The bill comes on the heels of Coiteux saying hispatience was running out, promisinglate last month that a bill was on the way.

"I have been patient, but I always said my patience had an expiry date, right?" said Coiteux to reporters on Thursday.

Yves Francoeur, the head of Montreal's police officers' union, has argued the pants protest is the only way to make"ourselves heard when we have no right to strike."

Martin Coiteux tabled Bill 133 in the National Assembly on Thursday. (Canadian Press/Jacques Boissinot)

Coiteux, however, contendspolice officers have special powers, and the uniform represents their authority within society. They should be easy to identify, especially in the case of an emergency, he added.

"With these powers come certain obligations," said Coiteux. "And wearing the uniform that symbolizes this authority in this very important role is something that should not be altered. And it should be respected."

The wearingof camouflage pants hasalso hurt the public's confidence in Quebec police forces, he said.

Thechosen form of protest has landed Montreal police in some hot water over the past three years.Officers were roundly criticized for wearingcamopants while working outside the venue ofJacquesParizeau's2015 state funeral.

And a Laval man got out of a $1,200 fine because an officer whotried to pull him overwasn't wearing her regulation uniform.He argued he didn't know she was a police officer.

Visibility 'the last means we had'

The president of the union representingspecial constables, who work in courthouses and other provincial government buildings,said he was "very disappointed" by thetabling the bill.

"By doing this, the government has acted as judge and party,"said Franck Perales.

Montreal police officers attended Jacques Parizeau's funeral in camouflage and plaid pants. (CBC)

The legislation leaves officers, who do not have the right to strike in Quebec,with very few ways to put pressure on the government and make public their concerns, he said.

"There is nothing left to incite the government to sit down and talk with us at the negotiating table," said Perales. "They took awaythe very last means we had ... visibility."

With files from Kamila Hinkson and Radio-Canada