Train inspector lacked experience and training, Lac-Mgantic trial hears

A former train inspector with Montreal, Maine and Atlantic (MMA) railway said he never checked to see if the train's previous engineer had noted any defects with the locomotive the morning before the 2013 rail disaster which killed 47 people.

Yves Gendreau, 42, told a Sherbrooke courtroom Wednesday he remembers watching the convoy leave the station at Farnham, Que., for Lac-Mgantic after visually inspecting the train's locomotiveson July 5, 2013.

• Accused engineer Tom Harding wasn't told of problem with locomotive, Lac-Mgantic trial hears

Gendreausaid he also did a separate inspection of the tank cars with an inspector from Transport Canada the day before the derailment and said he didn't notice any abnormalities.

Gendreau, testifying with a poised demeanour for a second day Wednesday, told Superior Court Justice Gatan Dumas and the jury that he couldn't remember many of the events leading up to the disaster with clarity, often answering questions with, "I can't say with certainty."

Former MMA locomotive engineer Thomas Harding, 56, rail traffic controller Richard Labrie, 59, and operations manager Jean Demaitre, 53, are on trial, each charged with criminal negligence causing 47 deaths.

Lack of experience

The judge asked Gendreau for a precision about the document used by train conductors to write down any problems they notice on the locomotive while operating it.

"Form 5001-a does that ring a bell?" asked Dumas.

"Yes," replied Gendreau.

"When you do your inspection, do you check to see if there is one on the locomotives?" pursued Dumas.

"At that time in 2013, it was not something I did due to a lack of experience or lack of training," replied Gendreau.

Gendreau told the court he boarded the locomotive to make sure the forms used for writing down defects with the locomotive were on the train, but he didn't check to see if anything was written on them.

• Few safety precautions for MMA's 1-person crews,Lac-Mgantictrial hears
• Railway safety regulations called into question atLac-Mgantictrial

Under cross-examination by Dematre's lawyer, Gatan Bourassa, Gendreau told the court he didn't have much experience in 2013 and only started inspecting trains by himself a few weeks before the derailment.

Brake tests

Bourassa showed Gendreau a brake test form with his signature on it, apparently indicating he'd tested the brakes on the train in Farnham on July 5, 2013.

"Where was this test performed?" asked Bourassa.

"I don't remember having performed the brake test on these cars," replied Gendreau.

"The only test that was done was the SBU test [a device to test emergency brakes]" he continued.

"This form that we see should have only have had the SBU number indicated, as well as the date and time," he said.

"Because in reality, it wasn't tested by yourself?" asked Bourassa.

"Correct, only the SBU was tested," said Gendreau.

Gendreau not in favour of 1-man crews

Under cross-examination by Guy Poupart, Dematre's lawyer, Gendreau admitted he only remembered the events of the day before the derailment because he'd listened to audio recordings the day before his testimony.

Gendreau also told the court he wasn't in favour of one-man crews on a train, a practice implemented shortly before the derailment.

"I don't know anyone in my immediate surroundings at work who was in favour of this."

Gendreau is expected to resume his cross-examination Thursday.