2 construction companies lose fight for $713K in extra costs - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 10:23 AM | Calgary | -16.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
New Brunswick

2 construction companies lose fight for $713K in extra costs

Brad Gould Trucking & Excavating Ltd. and Bird Construction Company will not be receiving compensation for the extra $713,000 they spent while building the foundation for the provincial law courts in Saint John.

Court of Appeal rejected companies' bid for extra costs in building the Saint John law courts foundation

New Brunswick's top court has ruled the province doesn't have to pay an extra $713,808 to two construction companies contracted to buildthe foundation for the provincial court in Saint John.

BradGouldTrucking andExcavating Ltd. and Bird Construction Companyexpected to remove the majority of the soil using excavators, the least expensive means of excavation.

However, they encountered "stronger" bedrock than expectedand broke it down using hydraulicrockbreakers, which is a more expensive excavation method, according to court documents.

That decision caused a significant increase in the companies' costs, which the provincial government ended up refusing to pay the extra costs.

With both sides dug in, the fight over extra costs to build the law courts building in Saint John ended up in front of the Court of Appeal.

Justice Richard Bell rejected the companies' claim for compensation onThursday, ruling that the province's geological Conquest Report provided enough information aboutsoil conditions anddescribed exactly what was encountered during the excavation.

"Through minimal enquiry, Bird [Construction Company] could have avoided its own error regarding the 'diggability'of the bedrock," the court documents said.

MarkMcGraw, Bird's estimator,admitted during the trialto not having a full understanding of soil and bedrock classifications by the standards outlined in the report.

The judge ruledreasonable assumptions about the soil conditions could not havebeen made by the companywithout this knowledge.

Instead, McGrawbased his analysis on measurements ofRock Quality Designation (RQD).

'There are a lot of other factors'

GordonMouland, the president of Fundy Engineering and Consulting, saidRDQmeasures the amount of fracture in the rock.

"It's [RDQ is]just one part of a description of bedrock,"saidMouland.

"There are a lot of other factors ...that would factor into howdiggableor how much effort it would take to excavate bedrock."

Hydraulic breakers are probably required in most cases.-GordonMouland, president ofFundyEngineering & Consulting

The Uptown Saint John area is built mostly on rock.

While the surface may be relatively diggable, it doesn't get any easier the farther down that workers dig, said Mouland.

"Hydraulic breakers are probably required in most cases," Mouland said.

Bird was on a fixed-sum contract with the provincial governmentwhen it enlistedGouldfor theexcavation. The two agreed on a fixed-sum contract of$1.25 million.

Gouldbegan working on the site in March 2010, and a month later, workers realized they would need to employ rock-breakers to break down the bedrock.

Gouldthreatenedto remove the company's equipment from the site if it didn't receive compensation for the extra work, but continued after Bird agreed to assist in presenting its claim to the provincial government.

In the end, the provincial governmentrejected the claim.