Moncton High location legal challenge to proceed - Action News
Home WebMail Thursday, November 14, 2024, 07:36 PM | Calgary | 2.2°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
New Brunswick

Moncton High location legal challenge to proceed

A court challenge by a group fighting the provincial government's decision to build a new Moncton high school on the outskirts of the city will go ahead, a Court of Queen's Bench judge has ruled.

Judge dismisses governments motion to have case thrown out

A court challenge by a group fighting the provincial government's decision to build a new Moncton high school on the outskirts of the city will go ahead, a Court of Queens Bench judge has ruled.

The government had filed a motion to have thelegal action by the groupof four Moncton citizens dismissed.

But Justice Zoel Dionne ruled Monday that the matter should proceed.

The group is relieved, said Scott Agnew, one of the applicants and vocal opponent of the move, as spokesman for a group called Royal Hoax.

Agnew andhis fellow applicants areseeking a judicial review of the government'sdecision to replace the old Moncton High School, which is located downtown,with a new building in the Royal Oaks subdivision, off Elmwood Drive.

'It's very similar to the French immersion situation, but this one is actually more serious in that we believe that the government actually acted illegally.' Scott Agnew, Royal Hoax spokesman

"You know, we've attempted to have meetings and just get some basic questions answered about this whole Royal Oaks situation and we've been stonewalled in every single situation," said Agnew.

"The government simply refuses to engage with the citizens of Moncton and tell them why, you know, explain to us the decision because it doesn't make sense on so many levels so really this is the first time we really, I guess, had our fight validated," he said.

"The court said No, there's merit to this case, it's going to go ahead and the court's going to make a decision. So we felt pretty good after yesterday."

Agnews group contends the government failed to consult the public on the high school project, and violated both the Community Planning and Education acts bybuilding the school outside the serviceable boundaries of the city.

"It's very similar to the French immersion situation, but this one is actually more serious in that we believe that the government actually acted illegally," Agnew said.

Government officials have declined to comment, saying the matter is still before the courts.

The next hearing is scheduled for Sept. 7.

The group, which filed its legal action in June, is asking the court to quash the government's decision.

Citizens have repeatedlyrequestedthe new school be located closer to the citys downtown. They have held rallies and submittedpetitions.

Theformer city counciland theOpposition Liberalshave also spoken out against moving the high school to the Royal Oaks location.

Government officials have said theyscouted more than 20 potential sites before choosing Royal Oaks in July, 2011.

The new school is scheduled to open in 2014, a year later than scheduled due to construction delays.

The estimated 1,300 students and staff will remain at the old school until the new building is ready, officials have said.