Shale gas development can be done safely, produce new jobs - Action News
Home WebMail Thursday, November 14, 2024, 12:25 PM | Calgary | 7.1°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
New BrunswickOpinion

Shale gas development can be done safely, produce new jobs

The development of a shale gas industry in New Brunswick can be done safety and lead to much needed jobs, according to Katie Brown of the Shale Resource Centre.

Shale Resource Centres Katie Brown argues shale gas can also help renewable energy sources

Katie Brown, a spokesperson for the Shale Resource Centre, said shale gas can be extracted safely in New Brunswick. (CBC)

New Brunswick has an important choice to make regarding shale development but contrary to what anti-shale activists would have people believe, this is not a decision between having economic growth or clean water. New Brunswick can have both.

While many argue that hydraulic fracturing needs more study before proceeding in the province, the truth is that hydraulic fracturing has been studied for decades and the overwhelming informed consensus is that the process is safe and does not harm public health.

Researchers at Cape Breton University recently released reports that found there is no threat to water from hydraulic fracturing as long as the process is properly managed and regulated.

Just this week, the U.S. Department of Energy released what the Associated Press called a landmark study, which found no evidence of hydraulic fracturing contaminating groundwater supplies.

Regulatory agencies in the United States have done extensive air monitoring near well sites and concluded that theres no credible public health concern with regard to air quality.

Brown said it would be "unfortunate" if the next New Brunswick government ignored the economic benefits of the shale gas industry on the "basis of the misinformation from anti-shale activists." (CBC)
In fact, several studies have actually concluded that the increased use of natural gas is dramatically reducing air pollution, which is improving public health.

For instance, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection found that, thanks to shale development and natural gas, Pennsylvanians are receiving between $14 billion and $37 billion of annual public health benefit.

Many anti-shale groups have argued that natural gas will increase greenhouse gas emissions. But thats not what the worlds most prominent climate scientists have concluded.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says in its latest climate assessment that hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling technologies, which has increased and diversified the gas supply is an important reason for a reduction of GHG emissions in the United States.

International Energy Agency also came to the same conclusion. As Environment Canada pointed out, its thanks to natural gas that the electricity generating sector is the largest contributor to total emissions reductions in Canada.

Finally, contrary to what anti-shale activists say about natural gas crowding out renewables, wind and solar need natural gas when the wind isnt blowing and the sun isnt shining. In other words, natural gas could help renewables thrive.

Opponents to the shale gas industry have launched many protests across the province over the last four years. (Jennifer Choi/CBC)
Not only is hydraulic fracturing environmentally sound, it will be a huge boost for jobs and economic growth in the province, helping to turn the economy around.

The Conference Board of Canada recently gave New Brunswick a D grade for economic health but a report commissioned by the provincial government found that shale development would be an economic force for the province, creating 4,400 new jobs, adding $1.6 billion a year to the GDP and generating $310 million in new tax revenue each year.

That economic growth would be most welcome considering that many people from New Brunswick are travelling out of the province to find work.

It would be unfortunate if New Brunswick were to pass up both the environmental and economic benefits of shale development on the basis of the misinformation from anti-shale activists.