Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

NL

Mistakes in RCMP timeline of Don Dunphy shooting death

Two errors in the timeline in the RCMP's report on Don Dunphy's shooting were highlighted Thursday at the inquiry looking into what happen in Mitchells Brook April 5, 2015.

Errors raise questions about other times in police report, says inquiry lawyer

RCMP criminal analyst Wanda Richards testifying at Don Dunphy shooting death inquiry on Feb. 23. (CBC)

Two errors in the timeline in the RCMP's report on Don Dunphy's shooting were highlighted Thursdayat the inquiry into the shooting, mistakes thatthrow the times of many of the events that day into question.

Joe Smyth, a Royal Newfoundland Constabulary constable,fatally shot Dunphyon April 5, 2015. Smyth was at Dunphy's Mitchells Brook home to speak with him about tweets he wrote criticizingprovincial politicians.

Smyth, who was then a member of the premier's protective services unit, has testified that he fired his pistol in self defence after Dunphy pointed a rifle at him.
Const. Joe Smyth testifying at the Dunphy Inquiry in St. John's. (Ted Dillon/CBC)

Timeline errors

The RCMP'stimeline says Smyth tried to phone Dunphy's friend Colin Dinn before going to Dunphy'shome.

We now know from previous testimony at the inquiry, that those calls were made to Dunphy'sphone, not Dinn's, calls that didn't go through because of poor cell service.

The second timeline error is that police said the calls were madeafter Smyth visited Dunphy'sbrother and sister-in-law, Dick and Debbie Dunphy.

We can't rely on timeline accountof whenSmythdrew his gun.- Kate O'Brien

We now know those calls were made before that visit and a lawyer for the inquiry says that changes other parts of the timeline, including what happened inside Dunphy's home.

While there is a time-stamped record of when Smyth called the RNC communications centre to report the shooting, Kate O'Brien said other times may not be reliable.

"It means the time between shooting and calling RCMP, (13 minutes and 15 seconds), we can no longer rely on that," saidO'Brien. "Because we can't rely on timeline accountof when Smyth drew his gun."

Kate O'Brien is one of two lawyers acting as co-counsel for the Dunphy Inquiry. (CBC)

These times will likely be significant when lawyers for Smyth and Meghan Dunphy give their final summations to the inquiry.

Any arguments suggesting evidence was tampered with ordenying that happenedwill likely make references to the timeline of events on the day of the shooting.

RCMPcriminal analyst Wanda Richards created the timeline in the police report, using information given to her by other officers.

Testifying at the inquiry on Thursday, she agreed there are errors in the timeline. She said that she has not been asked to revise the times.

Smyth'ssupervisor testifies

RNC acting Inspector Joe Gullagesays "he shook his head" when he read the April 10emailSmyth sent to members of the RNC and some members of the RCMP.

The emailexpressed no regret but wishedsome other kind of earlier intervention had been possible.

"Although I cannot regret my actions last Sunday, I unequivocally wish I could have visited Mr.Dunphyat a point in his life where another level of intervention may have been possible," wrote Smyth.

Testifying Thursday, Gullage said he thought the email should not have been sent because Smyth was under investigation at the time and therefore shouldn't have been speaking with colleagues about the incident.
Acting RNC Inspector Joe Gullage testifying at the Dunphy shooting death inquiry on Feb. 23. (CBC)

When Smyth testified, he was critical of the RNC saying it should have done more to support him publicly after the shooting.

Gullage said he agreed with some of what Smyth said.

"More could have been done to explain police use-of-force training," he said.

Responding to questions from Meghan Dunphy's lawyer, Bob Simmons, about the decisions Smyth made leading up to the shooting, Gullagesupported Smyth.

Simmonds asked: "Shouldn't Smyth have phoned and made an appointment first? There's no evidence he would have had a negative reaction?"

Gullage responded: "I can't really answer. Each officer has a different style of risk assessment. There are all kinds of things that could have been done but I don't question Smyth's decision. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. We would done a lot have things differently."

Answering questions from Smyth's lawyer, Jerome Kennedy, about Smyth's decision to visit Mitchells Brook alone on Easter Sunday, Gullagewas supportive.

"I have absolutely no concerns with what Smyth did," said Gullage.

The RCMPinvestigatedthe shootingand concluded that Smyth used appropriate force.