No government money in budget for rural relocation program

Recently released documents show the Newfoundland and Labradorgovernment has never budgeted money to back up a program to resettleremote communities.

• Resettlement offer appealing to tiny N.L. communities, say leaders

In 2013, governmentincreased the financial incentiveto help peoplemove from isolated areas to larger centres, from $100,000 to $270,000 per household.

Central Morning8:35A Look At Relocation Costs For Little Bay Islands

The provincial government would save money if it relocated people on Little Bay Islands. You'll be surprised where the savings would come from.

To take advantage of the relocation money, 90 per cent of a community's residentswould have to agree to move. Government would then terminate electricity and other services.

After a recent close vote 89.47 percent in favour ofthe resettlement of Little Bay Islands in Note Dame Bay, the Minister of Municipal Affairs, Eddie Joyce, said the policy would be reviewed.

• Resettlement policy under review after Little Bay Islands vote

He insisted the decisionwasn't about money.

"At no time did the decision that was made ever center around the amount of money that would have to be paid out," Joyce told CBC.

"There was an analysis done, a financial analysis was done, and it would save government money over time."

Not adding up

Documentsreleased under the Access to Information Act and published on the governmentwebsiteshow how much savings there could be over a 20-year period.

The big savings $20 million over two decadeswould come from the amount needed tokeep the ferry running, roadsmaintained and to provide diesel power to the community.

Shutting down a school would be a smaller, short-term saving since the last student will graduate in two years.

There would also be an upfront cost to resettlement, if the government had agreed to round upthe Little Bay Islands vote to 90 per cent.

Relocating residents would have cost the government more than $14million dollars,and a Treasury Boardemailsays there was no budget in place for that, or any settlement.

Other votes

Residents in theisolated communities ofWilliams Harbour, Nippers Harbour andMcCallumalso voted forresettlement.

• Nippers Harbour residents want to leave, while government says no
• Resettlement policy needs reform: McCallum resident
• Williams Harbour votes 96% in favour of relocation, only 1 'no' vote

McCallumdidn't get enough votes. Only77 per cent voted in favour of leaving.

Nippers Harbour had98 per cent say yes, but government saidit was cheaper for them to stay.

Williams Harbour voted96 per centin favour of relocation, but the Department of Municipal Affairs said that casehas been delayed because two families who were deemed non-residentshave hired a lawyer and filed a judicial review.

"If the outcome results in the yes vote being upheld, the process of allocating compensation will proceed," said the department in a statement Friday.