Nalcor changing tone on Mud Lake floods, after repeatedly deflecting blame

Nalcor is changing its tune about the role its operations may have played in causing high water levels along the Churchill Riverand subsequent flooding in Mud Lake, which required residents to evacuate and destroyed homes.

• Nalcor 'dismissiveness' a worry when it comes to flood blame, say MUN profs
• Muskrat to blame? Evacuated Mud Lake fearsmegaprojectcaused flood

"I believe, initially, we responded honestly, but probably not in the best way," Nalcor'svice-president Jim Keating told CBC Radio's Labrador Morning.

"The tone was dismissive, it was, 'Don't look here.' That was not productive ... It raised suspicion."

Following the flood, Nalcorofficials repeatedly said there was no manipulation of the water at the dam and that water levels were being constantly maintained at a level of 21.5 metres in the dam's reservoir.

Mud Lake flood: More residents arrive in Happy Valley-Goose Bay

7 years ago

Duration 1:07

Mud Lake residents arrive at the Happy Valley-Goose Bay airport after being evacuated from their town due to flooding from the Churchill River.

"Anything that is happening with the spring thaw, it's really just passing through the spillway. So we're not doing anything with our normal operations to have impacted that water flow downstream,"Deanne Fisher, Nalcor's general manager of corporate affairs said last Thursday.

'I offered no defence'

However, residents continued to voice their suspicions, followed by others in the academic realm.Keating'scomments come just one day after two associate professors at Memorial University in St. John's told CBC Radio's On the Go that Nalcor should not be outright denying it is at fault for the floodingbecause there isn't enough data to rule it out.

Keating now says he understands the questions being raised.

"In our meetings, I clearly stated, it's entirely reasonable to accuseNalcorof either creating or contributing to the flood. If I were them, I would offer the same condemnation and I offered no defence,"Keatingsaid of his meeting with residents earlier this week.

"The answers that they need requires the kind of analysis in the data that of course we have and we have lots more data. Is it full and perfect? I wouldn't even begin to assess that."

Long-time residents, some who have lived in Mud Lake and the surrounding community for more than 60 years,said they had never experienced flooding to this extent. They refer to traditional knowledge that dates back even further, which doesn't speak of any sort of episode which brought water levels up this high.

Earlier this week, Premier Dwight Ball vowed to get to the bottom of what caused the flooding and had this responseto a resident who told him Nalcor should not be represented on the committee tasked with investigating the issue.

"We've got to include as many people as we can, independent of Nalcor and those folks," Ball said at the public meeting on the Victoria Day holiday.

Keating said he supports a review or examination into the flooding.

"I committed to the study. I committed to the use of their local knowledge," he said.

"I committed to independence and I committed to working with anyone [Mud Lake residents] would choose, or select to work as an advocate on their behalf to make sure the concerns of the event were duly considered."