N.L. appeals court won't hear case about constitutionality of COVID-19 travel restrictions - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 07:05 PM | Calgary | -11.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
NL

N.L. appeals court won't hear case about constitutionality of COVID-19 travel restrictions

Newfoundland and Labrador's Court of Appealwon't hear a case that made national headlines debating theconstitutionality of the province'sCOVID-19 travel restrictions in 2020.

Court says case is moot due to restrictions no longer being in place

A sign for the Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal.
The Newfoundland and Labrador Court of Appeal ruled it will not hear a case about the constitutionality of the province's COVID-19 travel restrictions in 2020. (Glenn Payette/CBC)

Newfoundland and Labrador's Court of Appealwon't hear a case that made national headlines debating the constitutionality of the province'sCOVID-19 travel restrictions in 2020.

The appeal was launched by Kim Taylor of Nova Scotia, who was barred from travelling to Newfoundland and Labrador onMay 5, 2020, to attend her mother's funeral.

That same day, the Newfoundland and Labrador government had amended Bill 38, the Public Health Protection and Promotion Act, to give police the power to detain people found in non-compliance with public health orders. A public health order also prohibited entry to anyone except those travelling for work, relocating for work orpermanent residents.

John Drover, representing Taylor, andRosellen Sullivan,representing the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, argued the travel ban was a breach of constitutional rights, including Section 6 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which allows Canadians to move throughout the country freely.

The ban was upheld in provincial Supreme Court in September 2020, when Justice Donald Burragesaid the ban did infringe on Section 6 but was protected by Section 1, which allows for reasonable exemptions to the charter.

In a ruling issued by the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, the court decided that hearing the appeal was moot due to the fact that the amendments in question the special measures order the government put in place in May 2020 and removed in February 2022 are no longer in place.

The ruling also says the "adversarial relationship" between the involved parties has ended, which was a key factor in deciding not to hear the appeal.

Get the news you need without restrictions. Download ourfree CBC News App.

Corrections

  • A previous version of this story said Kim Taylor was represented by lawyer Rosellen Sullivan. In fact, Sullivan represented the Canadian Civil Liberties Association.
    Aug 16, 2023 11:50 AM NT

Add some good to your morning and evening.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter for the top stories in Newfoundland and Labrador.

...

The next issue of CBC Newfoundland and Labrador newsletter will soon be in your inbox.

Discover all CBC newsletters in theSubscription Centre.opens new window

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Google Terms of Service apply.