NunatuKavut and Innu Nation both claim victory as judge dismisses court challenge

NunatuKavutcommunity council is celebrating a victory after a judge dismissed achallenge to have an agreement it signed with the federal government thrown out.

So too is the Innu Nation, whichhad argued the agreement gavefederal recognition to agroup it considers to be illegitimate.

On Wednesday, Judge Cecily Y. Strickland rejected the Innu Nation's application for judicial review of a contested memorandum of understanding between the federal government and the NunatuKavut community councilthat was signed in 2019.

In her decision, Strickland said the agreement does not actually recognize the NCC as having Indigenous rights.

"I agree with NCC that there is no direct link or causal connection between the Crown conduct, the entering into the MOU, and any possible adverse impacts to the applicant's Section 35 Rights," she wrote.

Strickland also said the Innu Nation will have to pay NunatuKavut's costs.

In a statement, NunatuKavut called the win "unequivocal" and said it can continue with its recognition of Indigenous rights and self-determination process without other Indigenous groups or the court interfering.

"This is a very important and significant day for NCC and NunatuKavut Inuit. We have been vindicated," president Todd Russell said in the statement.

"This is particularly so as this court case has been used as part of a targeted and violent misinformation campaign against NCC and our people by Innu Nation and Nunatsiavutgovernment."

NunatuKavut community council formerly the Labrador Mtis Association and the Labrador Mtis Nation represents 6,000 self-identifying Inuit in south and central Labrador.

The group is not recognized by the national organization Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, nor Nunatsiavut, the Inuit government in Labrador.

Russell said he's looking forward to continuing negotiations with the federal government and advancing the group's rights and recognition.

In the 2019 memorandum of understanding, the Trudeau government described NunatuKavut as an Indigenous collective capable of holding Indigenous rights under section 35 of Canada's Constitution.

Strickland wrote the memorandum was an "expression of good will and political commitment and does not create, recognize or deny any legal or constitutional right or obligation on the part of either party."

Innu Nation fires back

The Innu Nation, which is made up of two First Nations communities in Labrador, also said Strickland's decision is a win.

In a statement, the group argued Strickland's decision affirmed its stance that NunatuKavut isn't recognized as an Indigenous collective capable of holding Indigenous rights under section 35 of Canada's Constitution.

"It's no surprise that in the wake of the court confirming that NCC has never been recognized as an Aboriginal people that holds s. 35 rights, that NCC continues to promote its own false narrative," said the statement.

In thestatement, the Innu Nation focused on Strickland writing that the memorandum didn't recognize NunatuKavut as an Indigenous group but that it "allows for a process to discuss the bogus claims."

"Innu Nation is deeply frustrated that we have had to waste time and resources to confirm this but are extremely grateful for this legal clarification on NCC's standing as an Indigenous people."

The statement said the Innu Nationis reviewing the decisionand will comment further at a later date.

Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Click here to visit our landing page.