No free vote, but there's still time to change the budget, says prof

A political science professor at Memorial University says a free vote on the Newfoundland and Labradorbudget can't happen, but that doesn't mean Liberal MHAscan't use other means to change its most contentious parts.

Kelly Blidook told CBC's Here and Now that budget votes are considered confidence votes, meaning that whileMHAscan vote as they wish,if theyvote against party lines they wouldeither have to leave their party voluntarily afterwards, or be kicked out.

"It's kind ofhard to have this person in your party and say, 'Yeah sure, you can be in the party with us but you just voted to say this government should fall,'" said Blidook.

• Why a free vote on the budget won't happen

A petition demanding a free vote on the budget has been circulating online, gathering thousands of signatures, and the official opposition Tories have been asking for such a vote during question period in the House of Assembly.

While Blidook says those gestures are symbolic, "people should absolutely be telling their MHAhow they feel about this."

"What people want is a different budget, and they should have an opportunity to say as much as they can about that," he said.

Pressure to change

Blidook said people can exertpressure on individual MHAs over aspects of the budget they particularly dislike.

That can result in that MHA threatening to vote against the budget, leaving the premier with a difficult decision.

"Am I going tolet this person leave, or am Igoing tochange it? And there still is the option for that to happen," Blidooksaid.

• Full coverage of Budget 2016

Blidook added there are many parts of the Liberal budget that could use tweaking, and there's still time to do that.

"They're in a tough position. They probably had to bring a budget that people weren't going to be happy with," he said.

"Ido think they could do a better job of explaining exactly why they've chosen the measures they have,and in some cases Ithink they could change some of those measures."

Blidook said the major blunder has been the deficit reduction levy, which he described as a "regressive form of taxation."

"Ithink you could come up with something far better, that would be much more progressive, that wouldn't take money out of the hands of the poorest people at higher ratesthan it's taking it out of the hands of richer people."