Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

NL

Posting explicit images now a criminal offence, advocate says

A new change to the Criminal Code of Canada gives the police a weapon to fight anyone who posts intimate pictures of others without their consent, says a legal advocate.

A new law makes it a crime to share intimate photos of someone without their consent.

9 years ago
Duration 3:41
Jonathan Crowe talks to Kevin O'Shea of the Public Legal Info Assoc. about what penalties people could face for sharing intimate photos without consent.

A new change to the Criminal Code of Canada gives the police a weapon to fight anyonewho posts intimate pictures of others without their consent, says legal advocate Kevin O'Shea.

Images of dozens of nudewomen from the province have been shared on a public website without their consent. The site appears to have been created last year, and has beenwidely shared on social media in recent weeks.

O'Shea,executive director of the Public Legal Information Association of Newfoundland and Labrador, says the amendmentstos.162.1 of the Criminal Code change how cyberbullying can be fought. The amendments became law in March.

"It makes it a new offence to do a number of things with videos or photos of a person in an intimate setting without that person's consent including publishing, distributing, transmitting those images," O'Shea said in an interview with Here & Now.

While thechild pornography law protected victims prior to March, that law applied exclusively to those under the age of 18.

"This new law applies no matter what the age of the person," O'Shea said. "The key difference is this new law is for distributing photos or videos without this person's consent the consent of the person in the photo or video."

Definingan 'intimate image'

The Criminal Code defines an intimate image as being one in which the subject is nude, partially nude, or engaged in explicit sexual activity.

"The other part of that definition is that at the time the photo or video was taken, there was some circumstances that led to a reasonable expectation of privacy, at least in the mind of the person in the photo or video," he said.

O'Shea said determining such a thing is difficult, and is something that will be determined by the courts on an individual basis.

As for potential charges laid under this new law, O'Shea said it only applies to someone distributing, posting or transmitting images or videos after March 9.

If found guilty, O'Shea said those indicted on charges could face up to five years in prison while summary convictions could carry a six-month jail sentenceand a $5,000 fine.