Concerns over transparency of Giant Mine clean-up continue

A Yellowknife environmentalist is calling once again for more transparency around the Giant Mine clean-up.

It's been almost four months since the Mackenzie Valley Review Board released its final report on the old gold mine's remediation. The board wants the federal government to go above and beyond the existing clean-up plan.

The 27 measures the report called for including askingthat Baker Creek be diverted away from the site. It also wants water treated to drinking water standards and suggested health monitoring inN'Dilo,Dettahand Yellowknife.

But local environmentalist KevinO'Reillysays he's worried government officialswho have the final sayontheprojectcould be evaluating the review board'srecommendations based on cost.

O'Reillyhas been calling for independent oversight of the Giant Mine clean-up for years. As it stands, the same department that gets the final say on howto clean up the the mine also has to do, and payfor the work.

"Too many roles, too much potential for conflict in there," he says.

Now he's concerned because Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada is getting internal input from the clean-up team on the report.

"Those folks, they've already had a kick at this project," he says. "If they're providing new information to whoever is going to be putting together the response for the minister, why can't anyone else see that?"

Project proponent and decision-making roles kept separate: AANDC

An email response from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canadasays the clean-up team has a responsibility, like any other project proponent, to answer questions and explain how the review board's report would affect itsproposal to clean up the mine.That mayinclude doing cost estimates.

Aboriginal Affairsalso says theproponent and environmental assessment decision-making roles for the review have been separated up to the highest levels.

No one from the department would agree to do an interview.

O'Reillysays it's an unusual case because typically a company proposing to clean-up a mine site would be separate from government. He says it is unclear how the two sections of Aboriginal Affairs are kept apart. Because of this, he says the clean-up team's assessment of the report should be public.

"Why hide it? Why not make it available. Everybody can look at it, put in their comments views about it whether something istoo expensive, costed too high or isn't feasible," he says.

"I think it would help build public confidence that the best responses possible are coming out and people from the community have had further input into this, rather than just the project team itself."

The clean-up is already expected to cost a billion dollars.