utsel K'e Dene First Nation rebuts arguments from Denesoline CEO about alleged fraud - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 03:48 AM | Calgary | -1.0°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

utsel K'e Dene First Nation rebuts arguments from Denesoline CEO about alleged fraud

utsel K'e Dene First Nation lawyers on Tuesday rebutted evidence presented by Ron Barlas's lawyers in an ongoing legal battle with the suspended Denesoline CEO.

First Nation says Ron Barlass lavish spending as CEO outweighed any financial gains

Lawyers for LKDFN continue to push the court to settle the lawsuit without a trial.
The courthouse in Yellowknife. utsel K'e Dene First Nation lawyers on Tuesday rebutted evidence presented earlier by Ron Barlas's lawyers in an ongoing legal battle with the suspended Denesoline CEO. (Robert Holden - CBC)

Lawyers for Ron Barlas and the utsel K'e Dene First Nation (LKDFN) met by video in a Yellowknife courtroom Tuesday, for a hearing in the alleged fraud case against Barlas.

Legal counsel for the First Nation continues to push the court to settle thelawsuit without a trial. LKDFN has accused Barlas, the suspended CEO of Denesoline, of misappropriating almost $12 million dollars of its money for personal gain.

Lawyers for the First Nation say Barlas needs to be removed from power, contracts torn up and properties liquidated.The only trial they want, lawyers say, is to figure out damages.

"A court does not need a trial to deal with a case as obvious as this one," said Matthew Sammon, the lawyer representing the utsel K'e Dene First Nation."There's oppression at every level of the CEO's functions."

Barlas continues to deny the allegations. Earlier this month, his lawyers argued his defence in the civil suit, saying LKDFN lawyers had massively overstated their case, taken evidence out of context and downplayed exonerating evidence.

LKDFN lawyers have continued to question the validity of joint venturecontracts between Barlas and the First Nation, alleging Barlas funneled money into these ventures solely for his financial benefit.

Lawyers also responded to what they called "misleading"statements about Barlas increasing the Nation's annual revenue since taking his position.

LKDFNargues thatrevenues increased due to Barlas's entrepreneurship, but his excessive spending left its net income worse off in the latter years of his employment.

The Nation also reported significant financial losses under Barlas for the 2020 and 2021 fiscal years.

LKDFNalso contested a previous statement made by Barlas's lawyers, who said it takes "overwhelming evidence" to terminate contracts. In a closing statement, Sammon said this is not true in the case of a "self-dealing CEO."

Parties will be back in court April 30in Yellowknife.