In letter to PM, Nunavut premier said Parks Canada took Franklin artifacts without permission - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 09:55 PM | Calgary | -11.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

In letter to PM, Nunavut premier said Parks Canada took Franklin artifacts without permission

In a letter to the prime minister, Nunavut Premier Peter Taptuna claimed Parks Canada took artifacts without permission from HMS Erebus, and called the search for HMS Terror 'haphazard.'

Peter Taptuna said Parks Canada took artifacts belonging to Nunavut, Inuit Heritage Trust

Marc-Andr Bernier, Parks Canada's manager of underwater archeology, sets a marine biology sampling device on the port side hull of HMS Erebus. (Parks Canada)

In a letter to Prime Minister Justin Trudeaulast fall, Nunavut Premier Peter Taptuna accusedParks Canada of takingartifacts from Sir John Franklin's lost ship HMS Erebuswithout permission, saying theybelonged to the Nunavut government and the Inuit Heritage Trust.

The wreck of HMS Erebus was discovered in September 2014, after years of searching. It is one of Sir John Franklin's ships from his 1845 expedition to find a route from the Atlantic Ocean to Asia through the Northwest Passage. HMS Erebus and HMS Terror became trapped in ice, and were later abandoned near Victoria Strait.

Taptuna's letter, first obtainedby the Ottawa Citizen,comes to light justbefore the first exhibit of artifacts from HMS Erebus opens at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, England. When Death in the Ice: The Shocking Story of Franklin's Final Expedition opens Friday, it will display up to 28objects collected from HMS Erebus after its discovery, including the most well-known artifact, the ship's bell.

The ship's bell from the Franklin Expedition shipwreck HMS Erebus sits in pure water in Ottawa in November 2014 after being recovered. It is one of the artifacts Nunavut's premier claims was taken from HMS Erebus without permission. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)

The letter isdated Sept. 26, 2016, the same daya shipwreck found off the shores of Nunavut's King William Island was confirmed as HMS Terror.It opens withTaptunaannouncing his pleasure at the discovery.

It also notes that the Erebus artifacts were taken by Parks Canada, even though they belong to the Nunavut government and Inuit Heritage Trust.

"The wrecks are in Nunavut and the GN has regulatory authority over them," wroteTaptuna, arguing that the"waters between the islands in the Nunavut archipelago constitute internal water [of Nunavut]."

According to the Nunavut Agreement, the territorial government and Inuit Heritage Trust "jointly own all archaeological specimens that are found within the Nunavut Settlement Area (including marine areas), except specimens found on private property, or within areas administered by Parks Canada."

In an emailto CBC, Parks Canada saidthat the agency "did not remove any artifacts from the wreck of HMS Erebus without permission."

"As the lead organization for the search efforts in 2014, Parks Canada obtained the necessary archaeological permits from the Government of Nunavut that allowed for the removal of artifacts should either wreck be discovered," the email reads.

"The bell's retrieval was done based on the archaeological permit provided to Parks Canada and the Government of Nunavut was consulted prior to the bell's excavation."

'Haphazard' search for Terror

The finding of the HMS Terror uncovered a strained relationship between Parks Canada and the Arctic Research Foundation around a communication plan and permits.

In the letter, Taptuna mentions the uncovering of HMS Terror "seems to have been outside the area subject to the permit."

"The finding of the HMS Terror to have been haphazard and not within the scope of the permits granted or the agreed to search parameters."

Clarifications

  • This story has been updated to clarify that Premier Taptuna's letter was written following the discovery of HMS Terror. An earlier version of this story suggested only that the letter may have been connected. Changes have also been made to more clearly emphasize the fact this letter was written last fall.
    Jul 11, 2017 9:55 AM CT