Peel appeal ignores spirit of final agreement: Yukon opposition - Action News
Home WebMail Thursday, November 14, 2024, 03:23 AM | Calgary | 6.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

Peel appeal ignores spirit of final agreement: Yukon opposition

Territorial NDP and Liberal leaders say the Yukon government's plans to file an appeal of the Peel watershed decision shows bad-faith bargaining, and undermines the spirit of the umbrella final agreement.

Territorial NDP and Liberal leaders want government to abandon appeal

Opposition MLAs are criticizing the Yukon Government's decision to appeal a Yukon Supreme Court decision that overturned a controversial land use plan for the Peel Watershed. (CBC)

Yukon's opposition politicians say the territorialgovernment is being bull-headed by seeking an appeal of the Yukon Supreme Court decision on the Peel watershed plan.

Both NDP leader Liz Hanson and Liberal leader Sandy Silver are criticalof the governing Yukon Party's decision to appeal a December ruling by the Yukon Supreme Courtthateffectively quashed the Yukon government's land use plan for the watershed.

The ruling found that the Yukon governments modifications to the plan did not respect the land use planning process set out in the territorys umbrella final agreementwith First Nations.Premier Darrell Pasloskihas saidthe ruling undermines the authority of the territorial government.

"They are essentially trying to 'unwrite' a covenant, an arrangement between us as citizens and agreements between governments," said Whitehorse Centre MLA Hanson.

"I think it's fundamentally flawed, and in the long term, will be very, very expensive."

Liberal leaderSilver, who represents the Klondike riding, says the government bargained in bad faith during theplanning process.

"We noticed that the modifications at that time were window-dressing at best,and now we find out that their plan really was to reject outright that plan and replace it with their own," he said.

Pasloski has argued that because the Peel watershed is public land, the territorial government should have the final say when it comes to its use. The Yukon government's land use plan provides protection from development for less than 30 per cent of the watershed, as opposed to up to80 per cent called for by the Peel Watershed Planning Commission.

Silver said Pasloskiand the territorial government refused to be honest when it chose to modifythe commission's final plan.

"With one word:'modify,' the Yukon Party government proved to be extremelydisingenuousas to their real intentions, which was a full-out rejection of the plan," he said.

"So for them to say 'Now we want to have our democratic right as a freely-elected government,' well, they missed their chance."

Both Hanson and Silver say the Yukon's reputation as a predictable place to do business will be damaged, and that it's not enough to wait for the next election. They want the government to abandon its appeal now.