Peel watershed: Darrell Pasloski explains reasons for appeal - Action News
Home WebMail Wednesday, November 13, 2024, 08:05 AM | Calgary | -0.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
North

Peel watershed: Darrell Pasloski explains reasons for appeal

Yukon premier Darrell Pasloski said today that land claims and self government agreements do not give First Nations the authority to make decisions on Crown land, and thats the reason the government decided to file an appeal in the Peel watershed court case.

Commissions are not elected and theyre not accountable: Yukon premier

Yukon Premier Darrell Pasloski in studio with CBC Yukon's Sandi Coleman of A New Day on Jan. 13. (Philippe Morin/CBC)

Yukon premier Darrell Pasloski told CBC News today that land claims and self government agreements do not give First Nations the authority to make decisions on Crown land, and thats the reason the territorial government filedan appeal in the Peel watershed court case.

"When it comes to public land, it should be the publicly, democratically-elected government that should be able to have the final say,"he said.

Pasloski spoke for the first time Tuesdaymorning about his governments controversial decision to appeal the Yukon Supreme Courtdecision last month that overturned the Yukon governments land use plan.

Its not only the right thing to do, Pasloski told Sandi Coleman on A New Day. I think its the responsible thing to do, because the outcome of this case can have significant implications.

Justice Ron Veales decision Dec. 2 effectively quashed the government's land use plan for the region a plan that allowed more room for development than one recommended by a regional land use planning commission. The appeal has put land use planning on hold across the territory.

Pasloski says his government decided to appeal to make sure that "a democratically-elected government"maintains final say over what happens to public lands.

"Commissions are not elected and theyre not accountable," he said.

Pasloski says that land claims agreements do not give First Nations veto power over what happens on Crown land.

"Self-governing First Nations have ceded and surrendered those rights, he said. First Nations make final decisions on settlement land. And First Nations participate in the decisions on public land but they don't have the final say."

Pasloski says the Peel case will set the bar for all Yukon land use planning and the government needs to establish the ground rules now.

Pasloskisaid he doesn't think the Peel land use plan needs to be decided by referendum.He says voters can make their opinions known at the next territorial election.