Canadian-style reconciliation commissions draw mixed reaction across Arctic Europe

It began with a funding announcement and a modest one at that.

Last week, the Swedish government announced $175,000 for preliminary work for the establishment of a truth and reconciliation commission on historical injustices against the Smi, an Indigenous people of Arctic Europe.

It's the latest Nordic countryto formally examine forced assimilation policies aimed at Indigenous people, despite organized efforts to create a commission since at least 2006.

Now, Sweden will join Norway and Finland, whose own commissions are already underway, in discovering the true impact of those policiesusing a method partly inspired by Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

But those commissions will have to overcome a deep distrust of the process among many Smi people.

Even before the commissions began, advocates have raised concerns about a process that extracts traumatic stories from Indigenous people with little guarantee of follow-through.

"There are public meetings where people are sharing stories that they have probably never told anyone," said Christina Henriksen, the president of The Saami Council, a transnational organization representing the Smi.

"Why are we sharing all this, if it's not going to do something for our future existence within these national states?"

A model for reconciliation

For millennia, the Smi have hunted, fished, and herded reindeer in northern Scandinavia, occupying a broad territory stretching from the Norway's western coastto Russianshores on the Barents Sea.

But from at least the 19th century, European governments in Norway, Sweden, Finlandand Russia pursued aggressive policies of assimilation grounded in racism.

Smi were put in residential schools and forced to convert to Christianity. Cultural and spiritual sites were desecrated, and Smi languages were suppressed.

That process, Smi say, has not ended.

Those Smi languages that have not already gone extinct are endangered. Advocates say racism has recently intensified as they have pushedfor rights to manage lands and resources.

Truth is great but what is the point if it's just another report put into the drawer?- Christina Henriksen, President of The Saami Council

"The majority population has been taught that they are an inferior, lower class of people," reads a 2018 report prepared for the Finnish prime minister on the feasibility of a truth commission.

"This way of thinking alone may also have a strongly finnicising[assimilating into Finnish] influence."

In Smi parliaments across Nordic Europe, political leaders have suggested truth commissions as one means of addressing these systemic inequalities.

"Sweden's dark history must be brought into the light for real change to be possible," reads a statement from Per-Olof Nutti, the president of Sweden's Smi parliament. "A truth commission can both investigate and suggest what measures can be taken."

Many havelooked to Canada's Truth and Reconciliation Commission for inspiration, which completed its work in 2015.

Nutti heard directly from Dr. Paulette Regan, the senior researcher for Canada's commission, and Chief Wilton Littlechild, one of the commissioners, in developing the Swedish process.

In Norway, where a commission started its work in 2018, organizers were inspired by Canada's method of public hearings, which they are mirroring in their own process.

They were also inspired to invest in "psychosocial support" for those who testify, partnering with a Smi health institute to deliver the services, according toDagfinn Hybrten, the commission's chair.

"I'm impressed by the depth and how comprehensive the process [in Canada] has been," said Hybrten. "But I'm also aware that it's been criticised, and it's been controversial, and much of the success of a process like this is not only in a thorough investigation, but certainly in a thorough and committed followup."

Another report in the drawer

It's the followup that concerns many Smi participants in the truth commission process.

"Of course we want the truth to come out," said Henriksen, with The Saami Council. "We want the Norwegian and Smi society to know what has happened in Norway, and in Sweden, and in Finland, but in many ways we already know that."

"So truth is great but what is the point if it's just another report put into the drawer?"

The commissions' work is further complicated by the actions of the Norwegian, Swedish, and Finnish governments, which at times are at odds with the message of reconciliation.

In Finland, "consultations revealed that the Smi do not trust the Finnish government and harbour a deep mistrust of the government's plans," the report to the Finnish prime minister reads.

"They suspect that the Finnish government is trying to improve its reputation internationally as a country that respects human rights at the same time [as] it is further weakening the rights of the Smi people."

That lack of trust is a hurdle for a process that relies on the goodwill of Indigenous people to disclose traumatic personal histories.

"[For] old people this is like the last violation, telling some officials here what they would usually tell psychiatrists," reads one anonymous testimony included in the Finnish report. "Then they just put it in the file right at the back. It conflicts with my sense of justice."

Rauna Kuokkanen, a Finnish Smi scholar, wrote that when forming truth commissions, settler states often define reconciliation as the venting of individual psychological traumas, rather than the eradication of structural causes of injustice.

Or in the words of Henriksen, The Saami Council president, "the truth overshadows the reconciliation."

Following through on reconciliation

For Henriksen, the truth commissions now underway in all three countries must find a way to meaningfully involve the non-Indigenous majority if they are to make progress on reconciliation.

"Why should they think this is interesting? Why should they feel that this has something to do with them? Because at the moment, the majority population can just say, the Smi issue is not our issue," she said.

That was echoed by the Finnish report.

"In Finland, information and knowledge about the Smi people is highly inadequate, which is seen as being one reason why the majority population view the Smi negatively," it reads.

More tangible reforms may not be on the table. Norway's truth commission excluded from its mandate questions of compensation and open matters of legal dispute, which include core issues like land rights.

That is a problem for Smi scholar Kuokkanen, who writes that in Finland's case, the only meaningful sign of reconciliation will be tangible progress toward self-government.

"It is unlikely that the [Truth and Reconciliation Commission] will succeed in bringing such a fundamental foundational shift," she concludes. "The Smi may well be reconciled into a contemporary injustice as the consequence."

For commissioners like Norway's Hybrten, the question is a political one how to make recommendations that address systemic inequalities, but remain palatable to settler politicians.

"Hopefully, we'll be able to recommend some measures that politically, will be feasible," he said, "and maybe also, so strong that it can't be ignored."