Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

North

Whitehorse council bans motorized use of Whistle Bend trail

Some neighbourhood residents told council members that allowing motorized and non-motorized users to share the trail is unsafe. A local snowmobiling association disagreed.

Some residents told council that allowing both motorized and non-motorized users to share the trail is unsafe

The perimeter trail is seen running along the right side of a housing development in this satellite image of the Whistle Bend neighbourhood. (Bing)

Whitehorse city council has banned motorized vehicles on a perimeter trail that surrounds the Whistle Bend subdivision.

The city designated the trail as multi-use, including motorized vehicles, in 2009. That wasbefore any homes were built in the new development.

There are now hundreds of homes and some of the residents spoke at city council's meeting Monday night in favour of restricting trail use.

"We have never participated in any previous discussion or consultation regarding the designation of the Whistle Bend paved trail," said Tim Brady.

Whistle Bend resident Tim Brady told council members on Monday that safety and quality of life issues were behind his opposition to motorized vehicles being used on the trail running along the back of his property line. (Mike Rudyk/CBC)

"When we purchased this lot we didn't know that our new home would be backing onto a motorized multi-use trail."

Brady said the trail is not wide enough for safe use by motorized and non-motorized users.

Mark Daniels, the president of the Klondike Snowmobile Association, countered there is no evidence that motorized multi-use trails are unsafe.

"So my concern is safety is a red herring thrown about in trail use," said Daniels.

Mark Daniels, president of the Klondike Snowmobile Association, told council there's no evidence that it's unsafe for motorized and non-motorized users to share a trail. (Mike Rudyk/CBC)

"Discussions by people who's real motive may not be about safety, but to keep motorized vehicles off recreational trails," he said.

After a debate, the council voted to make the trail non-motorized until a viable alternative is brought forward.

Background information provided to council by city staff said the original plan was to build two perimeter trails with one designated for motorized use, but that did not happen.

With files from Mike Rudyk