Fishery growth has had positive impact on First Nations in the Maritimes: report

An increase in band-held commercial fishing licencessince the Marshall ruling on Indigenous treaty rights hasgenerated dramatically higher revenues for First Nations in the Maritimes,says an academic who studied Ottawa'sresponse to the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision in 1999.

This is despite "understandable" frustration theMi'kmaqand Wolastoqiyik(Maliseet)feel over the Marshall decision's promise of arightto earn a moderate livelihood while fishing, said Ken Coates, a senior fellowwith the Macdonald-Laurier Institute.

"The federal government spent a lot of money and over a long period of time. But [theFirst Nations]actually got a fairly good return. It doesn't mean that all the issues are resolved, as we know, in Nova Scotia, but at least they've been trying," saidCoates.

In a study published last fall by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, Coates examined the impact of the Marshall decision on its 20th anniversary.

Some of the study's key findings include:

• Ottawa has spent $545 million since 1999 buying out commercial licences and building capacity so First Nations could enter the commercial fishery in a meaningful way.
  
• In 2009, Maritime bands held1,238 commercial fishing licencesout of a total of 11,727 licences in the region.That's up from 316 in 1999.
  
• Landingsby First Nationsaccountedfor six per centof the total market for all species in the region in 2016.
  
• In 2016, those licences generated $126million in revenue for bands in the Maritimes, up from $3 million in 1999. The entire East Coast fishery generated$2.2 billion in 2016.
  
• In 2018, the Maritime bands operated 320 vessels, employed 1,461 harvesters and 234 captains.

The Nova Scotia numbers

The Marshall decision has deep roots inNova Scotia. At thecentre of the rulingwasDonald Marshall Jr., a Mi'kmaw man from Membertou First Nation in Cape Breton.

On Sept. 17, 1999, the Supreme Courtruled that Marshall,charged with fishing eels outside of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans [DFO] regulated season, was justified in doing so under the 1760s Peace and Friendship Treaties.

Nova Scotia First Nations have taken advantage of the entry provided by Ottawa since 1999,accumulating more licences as their fisheries grew.

According to Coates, Pictou Landing First Nation had one community-owned lobster boat in 1999. Today, it owns 20 boats and holds 13 lobster and eight snow crab licences.

Eskasoni First Nation, in Cape Breton, holds 11 of 28 shrimp licences in Nova Scotia.

In Nova Scotia alone, the 2016-17 season generated $52 million in band revenue from a variety of species, up from $2.5 million in 1999.

Coatessaidthe impactof the growing fishery has been substantial in First Nations communities, reflected in improved income, business development and unemployment rates.

"What is really hard to quantify, but it is there in those numbers somewhere, is actually the impact on pride, self-worth, the sense of control of their own destiny," Coates said.

"One of the things the Marshall decision did was it recognized something that non-Indigenous people had failed to recognize for 200 years. And that was that their 18th-century treaties were valid, were aliveand guaranteed you a place in the economy."

The unfinished business of 'moderate living'

The Supreme Court's decision guaranteedthe Mi'kmaqthe constitutional right to a "moderate living," without defining it, and that has been an ongoing source of frustration for First Nations and uncertainty for the industry.

Coates does not share the view of some Mi'kmaw leaders who blame the federal government entirely for failing to define a "moderate livelihood"in regulation.

"It isn't fair to say the Government of Canada has ignored that. They've tried to negotiate it. It isn't fair to say the Mi'kmaq have ignored it. They pushed really, really hard," he said.

"It is such a strange requirement that it really begs the question why the Supreme Court put it there in the first place. But it is a constraint on the aspirations and ambitions of First Nations in Nova Scotia. And I don't blame them for being frustrated."

Tensions erupt after years of calm

In 2019, theSipekne'katik First Nation in Nova Scotia sold lobster on a Digby wharf to make a statement about their treaty rights.

In September, Sipekne'katiklaunched a self-regulated, "moderate livelihood " lobster fishery. It's taking place while the commercial season in the area is closed.

The band,which holds 30 commercial fishing licences,said it's exercising the treaty right recognized by the Marshall decision. So far, 10 licences have been issued to band members, who receive 50 lobster trap tags.

The numbers involved in the livelihoodfishery so far are minuscule compared to the commercial fishery a single commercial lobster boat carries 350 traps.

N.S. lobster dispute could have lasting consequences

4 years ago

Duration 2:02

There are growing calls for Ottawa to intervene in an escalating dispute between Mikmaq lobster fishers and commercial fishers in Nova Scotia, which could cause a ripple effect across the country as Indigenous groups assert their right to the resources.

Non-Indigenous fishermen have protestedmembers of theSipekne'katikband fishing when theseason is closed. They say that catching lobster outside the mandated season, particularly during the summer spawning period, will negatively impact stocks.

Shortly after the self-regulated fishery was launched, commercial fishermen hauled up lobster traps set by Mi'kmaw fishermen. Theydumped the trapsin the parking lot of anearby Department of Fisheries and Oceansoffice in Meteghan, N.S.

Sipekne'katik officials argue the amount of lobster that will be harvested and sold is tiny compared to what's caught during the commercial season that begins in late November and runs until the end of May. Some fisheries experts agree that the small scale of the Mi'kmaw fisheryis not a threat to conservation efforts.

Mike Sack, chief of Sipekne'katik First Nation, said earlier this week thattalks are progressing with the federal government about the moderate livelihood fishery.

Two other Nova Scotia bands are poised to launch their own self-regulated fisheries outside DFO regulations and seasons.

Coates said it's no surprisethe Mi'kmaw moderate livelihood fisheryhas commercial fishermen concerned.

"It hascreated this enormous uncertainty for the non-Indigenous fishers. You don't know where it's going to go," he said.

Updated listshows 2,377Maritimelicences

Late Thursday afternoon, DFO provided a list of commercial fishing licences held by bands in Atlantic Canada.The data indicatesthe number of commercial licences held by bands is larger thanreported by Coates.

In the Maritimes, bands hold 2,377 licencesout of the total amount of approximately11,500.

In Nova Scotia, First Nations hold 684 commercial licences with the Native Council of Nova Scotia, which includes

• Mime'j Seafoods Limited (118)
• Pictou Landing (146)
• Acadia(84)
• Millbrook(64)
• Eskasoni (53)
• Wagmatcook (44)
• Sipekne'katik (37)
• Paqtnkek (36)
• Membertou (34)
• Glooscap (31)
• Annapolis Valley (25)
• Waycobah (20)
• Chapel Island (16)
• Bear River (14)
• Potlotek (6)
• Afton (1)
• We'koqma'q (1)

On PrinceEdward Island,bands hold 772 commerciallicences inLennox Island (353), Abegweit(201), and the Native Council of P.E.I. (218).

In New Brunswickthe total is 921, with Elsipogtog holding 333 and Esgenopetitj with 163.

In Quebec, Wolastoqiyik(Maliseet) and Mi'kmawbands hold 74 licences.

Indigenous communities located in the department's Newfoundland region,which includesMiawpukek, Qalipu, Innu, Nunatsiavut, Nunatukavutcommunity council and Mi'kmaq, hold397.