Nova Scotia Power may face competition from renewable energy companies - Action News
Home WebMail Tuesday, November 26, 2024, 12:14 PM | Calgary | -8.3°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia Power may face competition from renewable energy companies

The end looms for Nova Scotia Power's monopoly on the province's electricity system.

Renewable energy companies may be allowed to sell directly to customers

Renewable energy companies may be allowed to bypass Nova Scotia Power and sell directly to customers. (iStock)

The end looms for Nova Scotia Power's monopoly on the province's electricity system.

On Monday, the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board will open public hearings to set rates and rules toallow renewable energy producers to sell directly to customers for the first time.

"We are in uncharted waters," said John Merrick, who represents the interests of Nova Scotia Power residential customers in regulatory hearings.

"There's never been an attempt to break up the electric generation, transmission and sale business in the way that is being proposed here."

Paying the toll to get onthe grid

The issue before regulators revolves aroundwhat costs Nova Scotia Power can recover from independent producersto get onits grid.

Nova Scotia Power has proposed multiple tariffs to cover a wide range of costs.

That includes"distribution" to "energy balancing" tariffs that kick in when developers produce too much and mustsell to their "spill over" to NSP,or too little electricityand NSP "top ups" the difference.

Renewable energy companies won't make a buck if NSP gets the rates it wants, said Dan Roscoe, chief operating officer of SWEBDevelopment, which produceswindenergy.

"We do not see providing a commercially-competitive product based on what is proposed," Roscoe said.

Residential customers pay about 15 cents a kilowatt hour, he said, butNSP wants to charge independents between nine and 11 cents in tariffs.

"That leaves us three, four, fivecents to produce electricity which is not very much," Roscoe said.

Acharge for 'no service'

Roscoe calledmany of the tariffs reasonable, but said he objects to the renewable transition tariff. That would allowthe utility to recover costs of building the province's electricity system.

"There is no service provided under the tariff," Roscoe said. "It's simply to recoup costs of fossil fuel assets they currently have and will no longer need or be used not as much as a result of customers leaving NSP."

NSP and its shareholders should bear the costs of writing off those assets, he said.

"The people leaving Nova Scotia Power will have to pay for their portion of Nova Scotia Power's assets," Roscoe said. "It's kind oflike you sell your GM and buy a Honda, but you still have to pay GM for their loss of profit on the car."

NSP protecting customers who stay

Nova Scotia Power declined an interview, but in its evidence, the company said it is respecting principles set out by the Liberal government when it passed renewable to retaillegislation allowing competition.

Nova Scotia Power is obligated to ensure that existing customers not subsidize new entrants and that the cost of opening the retail market should be borne by the participants in that market, vice presidentMarkSidebottomsaid in a filed opening statement for Monday's hearing.

"The tariffs proposed are costbased and will operate to ensure that those customers, who choose to continue to takeregulated bundled service, do not unfairly bear the cost of providing this new service," Sidebottom said.

Port Hawkesbury Paper weighs in

Concerns are being raised about the potential of application of renewable to retailtariffs on so-called "behind the meter" transactions, where customers do not use any Nova Scotia Power infrastructure.

Port Hawkesbury Paper argues that was never intended by the provinicial government, and sothe new tariffs should not apply.

"If NSPI's current interpretation is correct," the company said in a filed statement, "then electricity customers in Nova Scotia that may wish to take alternative electricity service behind the meter would actually be in a worse position than they would have been absent the introduction of the RtRlegislation."

Developer promises immediate 10% discount

One wind developersaid he intendsto avoid NSP's distribution system because he says it has not been adequately upgraded.

LucianoLisiofCBEXGroupsaid heshould not have to pay for any of it.

"We want to deliver behind the meter," Lisi said.

"We want to deliver directly to the consumer and we guarantee a 10 per cent discount from the moment they sign and if they sign longer term, 20 per cent cheaper than anything they can buy from Nova Scotia Power."

Caution

Nova Scotia consumer advocate John Merrick says regulators will have to be careful.

"It's complicated by the fact that this is basically a pretty small electricity marketplace,which makes it all the more difficult to break it into pieces and yet have each piece being profitable on its own,"Merrick said.

"There isn't enough surplus, if you will, to go around comfortably."

Hearing the case will be utility and review board chairmanPeterGurnham, as well asKulvinderDhillonand RolandDeveau.

Five days of hearings are scheduled.