Halifax university spends $447K on legal fight over one football player

Saint Mary's University has spent almost $450,000 onlegal fees since last fall in an attempt to provea football player was eligible to suit up for the team last season and thebill is growing.

Last fall, the eligibility of wide receiver Archelaus Jack was called into question because of time he previously spent as a member of the Saskatchewan Roughriders' practice roster in 2016.

The legal battle played out in courts in Nova Scotia and Ontario, and included a Remembrance Day hearing in Nova Scotia Supreme Court over whether the Loney Bowl championship game would go ahead.

How the legal fees break down

To date, the fees total$447,342.51, of which$252,276.95 comes from McInnes Cooper in Nova Scotia, while the remaining$195,065.56 was forwork the legal firm Blakes did in Ontario.

The information provided to CBC News shows the amounts paid for legal services, but doesn'tprovide details about the services rendered.

The university declined an on-camera interview with CBCNews, but issued a statement:

"When we made the decision to defend our student-athletes and the University, we understood there would be expenses associated with upholding the agreement and protecting our students, and we accept those costs," said Margaret Murphy, the university's associate vice-president of external affairs.

She said the university was forced to take legal action because U Sports, the national governing body of university sport in Canada,had breached anagreement, which she said was made in good faith and was legally binding.

According to the university's 2017-18 financial statements, the university received $36.25 million in funding from the province for that fiscal year.

LabiKousoulis,the minister responsible for the department that oversees advanced education, said universities are private institutions and it's up to them to decide how they spend their money, buthe's confident the legal expenses were money well spent.

Province is OK with SMU's spending

"I have complete trust in their board, complete trust in their president. Any investments they're making, I'm more than comfortable and satisfied with them," he said.

The almost $450,000 in legal fees is the equivalent to tuition and fees for one year at Saint Mary's for50 full-time arts students, or about 45 commerce students.

The Saint Mary's University Students' Association declined comment.

The question of Jack's eligibility resulted in Atlantic University Sport (AUS), the governing body ofuniversity sport in Atlantic Canada, cancelling a playoff game between Saint Mary's and Acadia University. A judge later ruled the game go ahead.The Huskies lost 45-38 in overtime.

Whether Jack was considered eligible by the tribunal will never be known, said Phil Currie, AUS's executive director.He said Saint Mary's and U Sportsreached a deal to not release the findings of the player eligibility tribunal in Jack's case.

Currie saidAUSis still in litigation with Saint Mary's over whetherAUS'sdecision to cancel the game was appropriate, which means legal bills will continue to mount for the university.

A dispute over what 1 year means

The dispute centred onthe language involvinghow long former CFLplayers must wait to play at the university level.

Saint Mary's interpreted the one-year wait time as being for one academic year, not a calendar year.

Currie said U Sports is updating the languagesurrounding player eligibility to make sure there's no confusion about its interpretation.

"Twenty-five of the 26 football schools have operated the same way forever and under the same rules as any other member in Canada, but if there is or was ambiguity, that's being fixed," he said.