Sweden has figured out how to keep food free of salmonella. Why can't Canada?

When it comes to controlling salmonella outbreaks, Canada could learn a lot fromSweden.

The Nordic country is on a passionate missionto eliminate the harmful bacteria from its food. Thanks to strict regulations that apply to chickens and other animals, few Swedes get sick from salmonella.

Meanwhile, outbreaks caused by contaminated food, especially chicken, are frequent occurrencesin Canada.

Every year, there are an estimated 87,500 cases of salmonella infection across Canada, according to the federal government's yearly foodborne illness estimates. While it's not clear how many of them werecaused by contaminated chicken, as of last week, 566 Canadianshadbeen diagnosed since May 2017with salmonella infections linked specifically to frozen breaded chicken products, and 95 of them were so sick with fever and diarrhea, they had to be hospitalized.

As a consequence, there have been 13 recalls of raw breaded chicken products in Canada since July 2017.

What is salmonella?

Salmonella is normally found in the intestines of animals, including birds, but the bacteria can beharmful when humans ingest it.

Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fever and chills are all symptoms of salmonella infection, also known as salmonellosis.

The bacteria can be spread between animals and people, throughwater,and can even survive on the surface of some objects.

Sweden's anti-salmonella stance

While Canadians continue getting sick, Sweden is leading the fight against foodborne illness. Along with strict biosecurity rules, it's normal procedure in the country to heatchicken feed to kill bacteria and to regularly inspectfor salmonella contamination.

"The number of cases among humans that are affected in Sweden is very low," said Lena Hult, the contagious disease co-ordinator with the Swedish Board of Agriculture's animal welfare department.

Only about 3,000 people a year get sick from salmonella, andbetween 70 and80 per cent are infected while travelling outside thecountry, according to Sweden-based research.

But it took years to get there.

Outbreak 66 years agowas a turning point

After a large salmonella outbreak in 1953 in which 9,000 people got sick and several died,Swedenrealized it needed to do more to protect its citizens, Hult said.

Contaminated sausage was the culprit, but it wasn't long beforethe Swedes decided to eliminate salmonella in all their food.

"In Sweden, it was the huge outbreak that made people and politicians really think that this is too big a problem we have to do something," Hultsaid.

When handling chicken, for instance, Swedes try to make sure that salmonella is caught and eliminated at every step of the production process.

Birds are tested to make sure they don't pass it down to their offspring. Once a chicken hatches, it's fed food that's been heated to destroy any bacteria.

Chickens are routinely tested at all stages of life.If a test comes back positive for salmonella, the flock is destroyed.

'You're never going to be bulletproof'

The head of the CanadianPoultry and Egg Processors Council points out that Canada's system already incorporates some of those practices.

"We clean out after every flock. We do all those sorts of things,"said Robin Horel, president and CEO of the council.

But Sweden'ssystem is more expensive, forcingconsumers to pay more, he said. Besides, "they still end up with outbreaks, so you're never going to be bulletproof."

Nevertheless, "we absolutely have to learn from [Sweden]," Horel said, whichmeans accepting that salmonella contamination can occur at any part of the chicken-harvesting process, and adopting a system similar to Sweden's to ensure it doesn't.

For instance, farmers in Canada don't follow the Swedish practice of checking chicken feed to ensure it's salmonella-free, saidRick Holley, professor emeritus in the department of food and human nutritional sciences at the University of Manitoba.

But they're taking other steps to prevent the spread of the bacteria, saidSteve Leech, director of food safety and animal health at Chicken Farmers of Canada, which represents 2,800 farmers.

They routinely clean and disinfect barns, have put in pest-control measures, and change their clothes afterthey've beenaround chickens, Leech said.

"We're looking at reducing salmonella contamination," Leech says, since "moving from reducing to eliminating is an entirely different perspective."

"It's a ubiquitous bacteria, so the measures [necessary to eliminate it completely]would be quite draconian," he said, such as Sweden's practice of destroying an entire flock if one bird is found to be contaminated.

Canadian chicken farmers and others in the industry are analyzing how the bacteria enters their farms and what they can do to prevent it, but Leech said they haven't found the answers.

'Consumers can put pressure on the market'

While that analysis continues, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) is already in talks with the poultry industry to try to set standards to reduce salmonella contamination of food, either in the processing or farming. The problem, the agencysays, is thatsalmonella is too common in the environment to set and enforce any standards. Instead, the agency takes remedial action only after people get sick.

"It's almost impossible to hold anybody fully accountable for salmonella being in the system," said Lyzette Lamondin, head of food safety and consumer protection at the CFIA.

"It's so widespread, and so part of the environment,it's almost impossible to figure out exactly how to get rid of it from the food system."

While Lamondin saidthe rates of contamination "do seem to be high and going up," she cautioned that measures to eliminate salmonella could hurt the chicken industry.

"It's not a small, quick, overnight measure," she said. "It's a painful measure to industry, because there are so many elements to it. But if we are actually ever going to get rid of salmonella in our system, that's exactly what it will require."

That said, given the particular health risk of frozen breaded chicken products, newregulations taking effect April 1 will requirethem to have salmonella "below detectablelevels." This means most producers will simply cook the meat first to destroy the bacteria.

In the meantime, the public can playa role in ridding the system of salmonella, saidHult.

"The consumers, they can put pressure on the market," she said.

"If they started to ask for salmonella-controlled chicken, it will probably occur. It's easier to do something where people see a big problem."