Chteau Laurier architect defends modernist addition

The architect behind the maligned Chteau Laurier addition is defending his latest design, and hoping once it isbuilt people will come to believethe beauty of the original historic building has been preserved.

Peter Clewes isbest known for the sky-scraping condominiums he's designed in Toronto.

But here in Ottawa, hisrepeated attempts at designing an addition to the iconicChteauLaurierhotel have been publicly panned.

His firm recently released the fourth proposal for an addition.

Clewes said criticism is normal.

"It's the human condition," Clewessaid. "We are fearful of change. We're very skeptical of change."

City staff are expected to release their official position on the latest iteration on Monday afternoon. Public reaction to each design has been swift and brutal.

Clewes said feedback has been incorporated into the latest design, but public opinion doesn't drive his work.

"I'm not a politician, I'm not trying to get elected. I'm just trying to do really good, passionate intensive work," he said.

'Once in a lifetime chance' to get Chateau Laurier redesign right, says architect

8 years ago

Duration 0:37

Architect Robert Martin says the latest Chateau Laurier redesign misses the mark and should honour the building's original architecture.

'Ugly,' 'hideous,' and 'insulting'

Seventy per cent of thepublic support the latest design iteration, according to Clewes's public consultation.But there's little evidence of that on the streets of Ottawa.

CBCNews stood outside the hotelfor over an hour and asked every passerby for their take. Only two people said they liked it, while more than 20 wereunimpressed.

"It's ugly," Ottawa resident Anisa Ali said. "Why would you make something perfect imperfect?"'

"It's not the Chteau LaurierI know," said Tom Schebywolok.

"It's devastating to see something like that it's almost an insult."

Terry MacDonald was more blunt. "It's stark. It's hideous," he told CBCNews. "Spectacularly ugly."

Clewes's buildings are all designed in a modernist style, almost the opposite of the gothic-styleChteau Laurier.

Modernism, Clewes said,rejects fancy ornamentation, and instead focuses almost entirely on utility.He makes the comparison with fashion and clothing.

"You wear something supremely uncomfortable but looks great, versus something that makes you feel better. [Modernism] is more comfortable, it's more natural," he said.

Lost in translation?

But Peter Coffman,an architecture historian with Carleton University, believes most people don't understand architecture theory they just instinctively know something is amiss. He saidit's because the two buildings have so little in common.

"It's like adding a chapter in Swedish to a story in French. It just doesn't work," Coffman said.

"You want an architect who speaks the language architectural language of the original and then is able to say something new in that language."

Architect Robert Martin said Clewes's team seemed resistant to learning that language. He was part of a team that also interviewed to design the Chteau addition.

He didn't get the job. Instead he was appointed by the city to anexpert panel to suggest improvements to Clewes's team.

"The design team seemed really focused on sticking with this really contemporary flat-roofed structure, which might be more appropriate in the sense of a condominium tower or a stand-alone building," Martin said.

The Fairmont Manoir Richelieu in Charlevoix, Que., which hosted the G7 this pastweekend, is an example of what Martin would have preferred.

The architects mimicked the existing style of hotel, but added some modern twists. The new wing of that building is clearly distinct from the original 1929 building, Martin said, but it still honours the style. In other words, the designs spoke the same language.

Theoretical fisticuffs

But here is where the architectural theories collide.

Clewessaidthere should be a contrast andbuildings should reflect the time period they were built in. By trying to ape the Chteau's fairy-tale allure, you couldend up with a "cartoon-like" reproduction, he said.

"I would argue that it kind of debases both the new and the old," he said.

The modernist contrast actually helps honour the older building, according to Clewes.

"There is a kind of fantastic clarity that occurs where you actually see the heritage building in clearer terms,"Clewessaid. "You're more aware of it, because what comes after is often very very visually simple."

And it is possible Ottawa will grow to love the addition, he said.

NablezonKakou, a tourist from France, said it reminded him of the debate over the glass pyramid that was added to the historic Louvre museum in 1989.

"You know, when they put the pyramid everybody said 'no, it's not good.' But everybody likes it now and we can't see the Louvre without the pyramid."

Clewes hopes that people will see that he put his best work forward.

"Some people might disagree with the architectural approach but I hope they agree that we take our work seriously and passionately and that we're trying to do absolutely the best work we can," he said.