Take 5: Latest Chteau Laurier addition design already under fire

Thefifth and possibly final version of the controversial addition to Ottawa's iconic Chteau Laurieris now public, and while it's smaller in scale than what was originally proposed almost three years ago, it's unlikely to find many fans among those who've already criticizedthe modern design.

Among the naysayers is the local councillor, who wants his colleagues to vote down the changes, despite the fact thatthe city's planning staff is recommending the redesign in a report released late Thursday.

"As theChteau Laurieris Ottawa's most iconic building within the Parliamentary Precinct, any modern addition, despite all of the height, connectivity and material changes, still does not fit the prominence for this location," saidRideau-Vanier Coun. Mathieu Fleuryin a statement released Thursday afternoon.

"Therefore, I am recommending that committee and council reject this proposal."

Compare designs

5thkickat the can

Declared a national historic site in 1980, the hotel is owned by Larco Investments, whose proposed expansion design back in September 2016 incited fury among hertiage experts and others, includingMayor Jim Watson.

Larco and its architect, Toronto-based Peter Clewes, have been revamping the design ever since. The second version, unveiled inNovember 2016, also got a loud thumbs-down for basically being a slightly smaller version of the original design.

The third version, revealed early last year, was quite different, and included an eight-storey pavilionwith 171 new guest suites. The new addition, which is to replacea crumbling five-storeyparking garage that was demolished last year, was touse materials such as white steel and glass.

Two more sets of tweakswere demanded by the thecity's built heritage subcommittee, theurban design review panel and council. Among the changes requested:

• Use more Indiana limestone and copper.
• Break up the north face of the additionso the wall facing Major's Hill Park isn't so flat.
• Change the arrangement of doors and windows, design details and geometric proportions of the additionso that they better matchthe original building.

Last June,council took the unusual step of approving the addition, while at the same time demanding changes to it.

Do-over 'disappointing,'Heritage Ottawa says

Heritage Ottawa has been a vocal critic of all the iterations of the Chteau Laurierdesign proposals, and this time is no different. "Disappointing" is how the group's David Flemming characterized the latest version.

He said the tweaks are merely minor improvements to a concepthe believes is flawed.

"It's really the form we're concerned about," said Flemming, the co-chair of the group's advocacy committee. "Compatibility has to be the guiding principle."

Fleuryacknowledged that the hotel owner responded to many of the city's criticisms and worked to improve the design, including the fact that the companyreduced the proposed height from 12 to seven storeys.

Still, Fleury saidthe "vertical nature of the materials and lines overshadow the addition." The breaks in the faade of the addition work well when viewed from Major's Hill Park, he said, but not when viewed fromthe east and north of the building, views that the councillor believes are "overly dominant."

While the addition would be a handsome, stand-alone building in another part of the city, Fleury said"this contemporary addition to the historic and iconic Chteau Laurier doesn't fit with this landmark."

The city did not ask that the addition be designed to match the original design of the hotel, which is in keeping with modern architectural principles that eschew copycatdesigns of historic buildings.

The plan is set to be discussed by the built-heritage subcommittee on June 3 and voted on by planning committee on June 13.