Contact with triple-homicide victims could have been more frequent, probation manager tells inquest - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 12:31 PM | Calgary | -10.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

Contact with triple-homicide victims could have been more frequent, probation manager tells inquest

Ontario's probation service couldhave been in more frequent contact with the victims of a 2015 Renfrew County triple homicide including whenthe murderer was branded a high risk to recommit intimate partner violence just months before his killing rampage, a coroner's inquest heard.

What probation officers did in overseeing the Renfrew County triple murderer

Three women.
From left: Anastasia Kuzyk, Nathalie Warmerdam and Carol Culleton were murdered in and around Renfrew County west of Ottawa on Sept. 22, 2015. (Photo illustration/CBC)

Ontario's probation service couldhave been in more frequent contact with the victims of a 2015 Renfrew County triple homicide including whenthe murderer was branded a high risk to recommit intimate partner violence just months before his killing rampage, a coroner's inquest heard.

"In this case,I think victim contact could have been made more frequently," testified James Pearson, a quality assurance manager for the probation service. "That isopen for areas of improvement."

Abusers deemed high risk should generally be met with"increases in most aspects of case management," including "more direct and purposeful contacts"with victims "on a prescribed schedule," Pearson said.

Pearson's testimony came on the 13th day of an inquestexamining the killingsof Carol Culleton, Anastasia Kuzyk and Nathalie Warmerdamin and aroundRenfrewCounty.

On Sept. 22, 2015, a man with a known history of gender-based violencemurderedall three womenafter repeatedly floutinghis probation orders without reprimand. Basil Borutskiwas convictedof three counts of murder in a jury trial and is in prison.

Inquest jurors, who are hearing from experts and first-hand witnesses in the case, are being tasked with recommending changes to policies and protocols to better protect and support survivors of intimate partner violencein rural communities.

Earlier in the inquest, an internalprobation service review writtenjust over a month after the murders was entered into the record. It foundprobation officersmissed opportunities to more closely monitor him, including gathering more information about him from collateral contacts, such as victims.

Borutski was convicted in 2012 of threatening Warmerdam'sson and assaulting a police officer and in 2014 of brutally beating Kuzyk. In both cases, he served some jail time and was released on the conditions that he not possess weapons and that he attend a counselling program meant for men who abuse their partners.

He never attended the program and fatally shot Kuzyk and Warmerdam.

Pearson, who previously worked as a probation officer in Lanark County and Ottawa for 11 years,had no direct involvement in thecase,nor did he speak to any probation staff who did, he said.

But after reviewing records, Pearsontestified Wednesday about the steps probation officers did or didn't take as the offender'slevel of risk was continually reassessed.

Victim contact became 'less regular'

The probation service initially contacted Warmerdam a week afterBorutski was released in early 2013 afterhis conviction related to her. Contact with Warmerdamthen became "less regular," Pearson said. Notes indicated she was "well-connected" with Ontario's Victim/Witness Assistance program, he added.

He was then jailed for assaulting Kuzyk. Based on his review of the file, Pearson said thatafter hewas released in December 2014 and Kuzyk was called,contact with her was not maintained.

Contact with victims is based on "the risk level posed," Pearson said.

He was deemed a high risk to reoffend in both December 2014 and February 2015 seven months before the murders according to a chronology of events circulated during the inquest.

Pearson was asked why he was not first assessed using atool specifically for domestic violence abusers until October 2013, 10 months after his release.

He said he believed it did not happen earlier because while theconviction contained "some concerning and egregious domestic violence charges,"it involved assault against a police officer and not Warmerdam herself.

Nathalie Warmerdam, centre, poses in a family photo with her daughter Valerie, right, and son Adrian, left. (Submitted by Valerie Warmerdam)

Pearson was also asked about what information the probation service received about Borutskiwhen he was released in 2013. One of the lawyers at the inquest pointed out that the probation order stated he should receive substance abuse counselling "as directed by" his probation officer.

Pearson said Borutski's brother and doctor indicated no concerns in that area, whereas Warmerdam warned that he got violent when drinking.

Hewas not referred to the counselling, Pearson said.

"Do you think it's good practice to consider the victim's information about triggers of violence in a domestic violence perpetrator to be less important than other sources?"Warmerdam's daughter, Valerie Warmerdam, asked Pearson.

"Certainly not," he replied.

Enforcement rules changed

Henever attended court-ordered counselling for people who abuse their partners and was not charged with breaching the conditions of his probation order, the inquest has heard.

Initially, the programming was being offered in an area hewas banned from, but when that situation was resolved hestill didn't go.

He then cited transportation as an issue because he had restrictions on his ability to drive, Pearson said.The probation service considered that a reasonable excuse andreferred him to the program again with a planned January 2014 start date because that driving restriction was expectedto expire then.

He was arrested and jailed that same month for beating Kuzyk. Once released on probation after that conviction, he still didn't go to the program, citing confusion and anxiety.

"Tolerance" for offenders notcomplying with the conditions in their probation orders once they're deemed high risk should be "decreased," Pearson said.

"In this case, I think we can see we woud have liked additional direction and enforcement. There's a gap there."

Pearson said policy has been changed in recent years to require a probation officer to make a decision about enforcement of probation conditions within one day of concerns about a high-risk domestic violence offender being known.

The counselling for abusers is now being offered in three locations in Renfrew County, instead of just the one that was available at the time Borutski was on probation, Pearson added.

Other system changes since the murders

The internal probation service reviewthat found missed opportunities for monitoring Borutski had recommended that the counselling program be made more accessible to people in rural Ontario. The Ministry of the Solicitor General has since created a funding pool to help offendersattend programming.

Mandatory "refresher" training waslaunchedfor probation and parole officers who have been serving for more than five years, Pearson said.

Twenty-five positions were added to helpoffenders who are in custody develop a release plan with a probation officer, though Pearson said he didn't know whether any of those positions were added in Renfrew County.

The findings of the internal review were shared with probation service managers and officials at the Ministry of the Solicitor General but not with other probation officers, Pearson said, citing employee confidentiality.

"It simply wouldn't be something that we would do," he said.