City likely on hook for millions in LeBreton cleanup, says Watson

Ottawa taxpayers could be on the hook for as much as $150 million to clean up the contaminated lands atLeBretonFlatsthrough the city's ownbrownfieldgrantprogram.

According to Mayor Jim Watson, theLeBretonlands would be eligible under the city program, whichwill pay up to 50 per cent of soil remediationcosts.

And with estimates for the soil decontaminationrangingfrom $170 to $300 million, the municipalcontribution to the clean-up efforts will certainly be in the tens of millions of dollars.

• Ottawa Senators-backed bid top choice for LeBretonredevelopment
• Why RendezVous won and why Devcore lost the LeBreton bid

As the Senators-backedRendezVousGroup only found out this week that it ranked aboveDevcore Canderel DLSthe only other bidder to redevelopLeBreton it has not yet formally approached the city about applying to thebrownfieldprogram, said Watson.

"We will sit down with the RendezVous people," said the mayor. "They are fully eligible to apply for that grant program."

The program's rationaleis to give incentives to developers to clean up and build on polluted land that would possibly otherwise remain vacant. Once the land is developed, it then generatessubstantially more property taxes than the original empty land although developed land usually requires more city services too, like sewers and roads.

'Long-term payoff'

Watson called the brownfield grant program "a short-term investment for a long-term payoff."

"We found in every single casethese projects would not go ahead without the brownfield project," Watsonsaid, citing a 2012 grant of $4.5 million to clean up a site at 280-300 Hunt Club Rd., a former petroleum storage sitethat is now a bustling shopping centre.

Just a few weeks ago, council rubber-stamped a $15-million grant to remediate lands on the former Oblate Lands in Old Ottawa East,currently the site of a major redevelopment.

Not everyone, however, buys the argument that these sorts of developments would never proceed without public money being used for land decontamination.

"I understand that argument in the abstract," said AaronWudrick, federal director of the Canadian Taxpayers' Federation.

But he's skeptical that a project as huge as the LeBretonredevelopment wouldn't go ahead with the city's brownfieldgrant.

'Bit of a stretch'

"The land's a highly desirable property.There was obviously a competitive bid process. There'sclearly parties that are interested in developing this property," Wudrick said.

"So to suggest that it wouldn't go ahead with developmentbut for this subsidy, I think, is a bit of astretch in this particular case."

Ian Lee disagrees.

Theassociate professor at the Sprott School of Business at Carleton University characterizes himself as a fiscal conservative and has disagreed with Watson in the past.

But this time, Lee is siding with the mayor. He points out that while the LeBreton Flats redevelopment may be a National Capital Commission project, it's the people of Ottawa who will benefit the most from its redevelopment.

"If we want the LeBreton Flats to be developed, I think that's the price we, the people of Ottawa, are going to have to pay," said Lee.

"I am not happy to see the governmentspending my money. At the same time, LeBreton is a disgrace."