Police chief insists force treats protesters the same after ticketing confusion
Eric Stubbs calls attempts to de-escalate 'agitated' convoy supporters a success
Ottawa's police chief says hetakesresponsibility for amessaging mix-upthat followed aFamily Day weekendconvoy protest, though he wouldn'tsecond-guesshow officers responded to "agitated" protesters launching fireworks downtown.
Speaking to the Ottawa Police Services Board on Monday, Chief Eric Stubbs took issue with how some interpreted policeresponse.
"Last week, there were reports that wehave a double standard or are sympathetic to the convoy movement and focused our enforcement on the Palestinian marches. This is simply not true," he said.
"We remain a neutral agency during protests with the goal of a safe, peaceful and legal event. Period."
He said police issued nine tickets toprotesters marking two years since police put anend of the self-styled "Freedom Convoy"and that there were no charges for the pro-Palestinian demonstration that same weekend.
In the wake of the protests, that message didn't get through clearlyto the public because ofwhat Stubbs called "miscommunication and misinterpretations."
Last Wednesday, bylaw services told media that its officers issued no tickets in response to the convoy protest.
That provoked an indignant response from someon social media and questions from a city councillor, who noted that just weeks before,bylaw had issuedexcessive noise tickets to pro-Palestinian marchers.
The issue of who is getting ticketed and why is a hot issue amongst my council colleagues and something that we are actively investigating. We are looking for a solution -- whether it is some sort of agreement around guidelines for enforcement...
3/7
—@somerset_ward
Later in the day, Stubbssent a message to councillorsthat seemed to contradict the bylaw servicesaccount, saying that "police and bylaw officers issued multiple violations to participants" in the convoy protest.
"That was an error," Stubbs told the board on Monday, explaining that the confusion arose from the fact that police issued tickets for bylaw charges.
Fireworks response meant to lower temperature
Talk of double standards didn't just stem from the muddy messaging.
Questions, including from a second city councillor,also cropped up over how law enforcement responded to fireworks launched by convoy members in the evening following their demonstration.
I'm going to be asking @OttawaPolice and @OttawaBylaw whether arrests were made or fines were levied during these "protests". If we're issuing fines for the use of megaphones during some protests, surely these acts merit punitive measures as well. https://t.co/N8FQXVuCHg
—@DevineSean
Stubbsconfirmed that police asked bylaw officers to leave.
"The tension and angst from the protest group was elevated when bylaw services attended the scene," he said.
"We requested bylaw services to leave the area in an effort to de-escalate the situation. As such, they did and didn't issue any tickets. This is a decision made on the ground to avoid potential violenceand I will not second guess it."
Stubbs said officers didn't advise bylaw againstissuing tickets. He said the fireworks were over by the time police arrived, but said that officers made sure the convoy protesters "understood the boundaries of lawful protest."
He noted that a bylaw investigation is ongoing.
Overall, Stubbs called the response an operational "success."
"It did bring the temperature down," he said. "The perception that it gives is unfortunate at the end of the day, there was no violence that ensued."
Limits for megaphones
The board showed little appetite to further dissectthe fireworks response, instead chose to focusonthe kinds of noise violations recently issued to the pro-Palestinian protesters.
Alta Vista Coun. Marty Carr, who is vice chair of the police board, asked police exactly when, in their view, megaphone use crosses the line to trigger a ticket.
While police called it a discretionary call, Stubbs said police try to find a "middle ground" but there are limits.
"Some of the things that have been focused on in recent weeks is ensuring that if a megaphone, for example, is being used, that there's no profanity that's being spoken about, no hate crime," he said.
"There's been instances where megaphones have been brought directly to a bylaw or police officer's face or head, or very close to that person, and there's yelling through it," he added.
"So there's certain situations where if it does continue that's something that would elicit an enforcement response."
The board also heard from lawyer Paul Champ, who represents a group of downtown Ottawa residents, businesses and workers suing2022 convoy organizers.
In his view, a group of protesters marching down the street with a megaphone is completely different from hundreds of trucks parked in the middle ofdowntown streets for weeks.
He again criticized what he called "under-policing of the convoy protest," but warned police not to allow the pendulum to swing back too far against other demonstrations.
"We are now seeing an overreaction, with egregious over-policing ofwhat I would describe as classic protest activities," he said, referring to marching down streets and the use of megaphones.