New tree bylaw proposes stiffer fees, penalties - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 11, 2024, 01:16 AM | Calgary | -0.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Ottawa

New tree bylaw proposes stiffer fees, penalties

Ottawa's proposed tree protection bylaw strengthensrules protecting urban trees and halting deforestation by imposing harsh penalties forbreaking them.

'This can't come soon enough,' councillor says

Paul Johanis, chair of the Greenspace Alliance of Canada's Capital, says he wants a moratorium on tree cutting before the 'teeth' of the bylaw comes into effect. (Krystalle Ramlakhan/CBC)

Latest

  • Ottawa city council approved the new tree bylaw Jan. 29, 2020.
  • It made one change: capping administrative fees for infill developments at $2,500.

Ottawa's proposed tree protection bylaw strengthensrules protecting urban trees and halting deforestation by imposing harsh penalties forbreaking them.

The new bylaw which will go before theenvironment committeefor approval next Tuesday, Dec. 17would blend two bylaws that currently deal with trees on municipal land andprivate property.

"This can't come soon enough. We've already lost so many trees in Ottawa, particularly in the urban areas," said Coun. Shawn Menard,vice-chair of the committee.

He said he believes Ottawa's current fines for removing trees without the proper permits are weak.

The proposed bylaw both increasesthe application fee for removing distinctive treesand ups the fines for developers and homeowners who break municipal law.

2 phases

The bylaw is laid out in two phases.

Phase one maps out protectionfor certain trees and how much it would cost people to bothapply to remove those trees, as well as what they would have to pay if they don't plant other trees in its place.

The application fee woulddepend on whether the tree is being removed because of an infill $500/tree or smaller-scale projects, like a pool or deck $150/tree.

An application fee wouldn't be charged if the tree is dead, poses an immediate danger, or is an ash tree.

Phase twowoulddecrease the diameter of a "distinctive tree" (requiring a permitto cut in some situations) from 50 centimetres to 30, but wouldn'tcome into effect until the summer of 2020.

The city is proposing to consolidate its existing two bylaws for municipally owned trees and for trees on private properties. (Robyn Miller/CBC)

Thephased implementation already has Paul Johanis worried about pre-emptive chopping of larger trees.

"Trees of that size are very difficult to replace," said the chair of the Greenspace Alliance of Canada's Capital.

"It takes decades to replace them. You need to plan the replacement over a long period of time and so, if they're lost right now, there's no prospect of having them replaced for quite a long time."

He wants to see a three-month moratorium on tree cutting before phase two comes into effect.

Too much focus on single trees

Meanwhile, at least one developer believes the bylawcontradicts the city's own official plan, which focuses on intensification.

"There really seems to be a choice of 'We're going to choose a tree over densifying on a particular spot' when we could do so many other things to enhance the overall canopy as opposed to one individual tree," said Jason Burggraaf.

The remains of a large tree sit piled behind a fence.
The application fee to remove a tree will depend on whether it's being cut down to make way for an infill property or a smaller construction project. (Matthew Kupfer/CBC)

The executive director of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association said the bylaw prioritizes older treeseven as city staff point out somemay be nearing the end of their livesand that it may impede the ability to build bigger, multi-unit buildings.

He believes the city should be prioritizing the overall urban forest, with younger trees planted nearby or in other areas of the citythat can provide more of a canopy in the future.