The Ford government has expanded Ottawa's boundary. Here's what's been added

Ontario's minister of municipal affairs and housing used his powers to expand the City of Ottawa's urban boundary last week by 654 hectares, and has included agricultural fields and lands near a quarrythat staff hadpreviously chosento avoid.

While not every last hectare will be developable,Steve Clark's additions released Nov. 4 and not open to appeal have increased the 1,281-hectareurban expansion council approvedin May 2020by about 50 per cent.

• Province approves Ottawa's official plan with taller buildings, wider urban boundary
• 'The devil is in the details' of updated official plan given back to Ottawa

"This is going to create more urban sprawl. It's going to be expensive for taxpayers," Mayor Jim Watson told reporters after his final council meeting on Wednesday.

Watsoncriticized the province for signing off on thecity's official plan without consultation,behind closed doors, and afterthe Oct. 24 municipalelections despite receiving italmost a year ago.

• Ottawa's new official plan approved by city council

The City of Ottawa gotextensive community feedbackover many months in 2020 and 2021. Watsonsaidwhen he was municipal affairs minister prior to 2010, official plans would see "minor tweaks," not "massive changes".

"What more can I say, except profound disappointment that the province is treating its second-largest city in this paternalistic way," said Watson.

Several hundred hectaresnot recommended

The Ford government, however,has been pushing to aggressively boost housing supplyas it pledges to make housing more affordable. It'sassigned Ottawa a target of 151,000 more homes in a decade, double what Ottawa had projected it needed.

Clark's press secretary,Victoria Podbielski, pointed out in a statement that all levels of government must prepare for population growth, especially with the federal government targeting 1.5 million new immigrants by 2025.

"Official plans are among the most important tools municipalities and the province use in partnership to prepare for future growth and housing needs," she wrote. "That is why, after careful consideration the Minister took the necessary action to accommodate this significant growth and allow for more desperately needed housing to be built."

Clark'sformal notice of approval included a map that showed the biggest additions to the urban boundary were located north of Kanata, east ofFindlay Creek, and in a rural area near Riverside South in the vicinity of the future Bowesville LRT station.

• Algonquins come out sudden winners in urban boundary vote

Councillorshad discussed the choices parcel by parcel in the winter of 2021, and city staff have already briefed council on how they scored using criteria liked their proximity to pipes and transit:

• InSouth March, the 175 hectares scored well but council had excluded them in favour of the Tewin proposal.ClaridgeHomes, eQ Homes, Uniform Developments, Multivesco and Mintoreleased a statement at the time saying politics had taken over the agreed scoring process.
• The 106 hectares near the future Bowesville LRTscored well.
• In Stittsville, 65 hectares on Fernbank Road hadservicing issues and werehabitat toprotected species.
• Another 14 hectares at Flewellyn and Shea roads on Stittsville's edgewere notrecommended due to anactive court case.
• Staff scored 207 hectares east of Findlay Creek poorly due to a lack ofcity infrastructure.
• There were 50 hectares east of Findlay Creek that weren't scored as they'retoo close to an active quarry.
• Finally, 37 hectares in Orlanswere not evaluated because they're designated an agricultural resource.

On average,38.9 homes are built per hectare in Ottawa on such wide-open areas called "greenfields," according to areport at planning committee last month.

Rural communities should be worried, sayscouncillor

Coun. Scott Moffatt, who co-chairs the planning committee and ends his time on council on Monday, wasn't surprised the province expanded the urban boundary given itstargets for home construction far exceed the city's.

The South March lands were "easy pickings" for the government, he said. But Moffatt has longchampioned protecting prime agricultural lands and is far more concerned the government chose to add those 37 hectares in Orlans.

Moffatt said he'd havepreferred the government first see how its intensification policies in Bill 23 might boost housing supply it intendstoallowtriplexes on each residential lot, for instancebefore also expanding suburbs.

By doing both at the same time, there's less incentive to reach the city's goal of building densely where services already exist, he said.

"The message it sends is that we can just keep growing out. And that should concern rural communities. That should concern the farming community," Moffatt said.

Ottawa isn't alone, however.The provincial governmentapproved the City of Hamilton's official plan the same day as Ottawa's and also added 2,200 hectares there as well, even though council had voted tohouse all of its future population through intensification and to holdthe existingurban-rural line.

Also on Nov. 4, the Ford government released a proposal to build 50,000 homes on tracts of the Greenbelt in the Toronto area, after previously promising not to open any of that land to development.

Watson said it will be up to the incoming Ottawa city council to be "forceful" and to "push back on some of the things that the province is trying to impose on us."