Why RendezVous won and why DevCore lost the LeBreton bid

It was an exciting, if tense, moment Thursday afternoonin the Elgin Street boardroom of the National Capital Commission when wefinally heard that theSenators-backed RendezVousGroup earned a higher markon the 140-point scorecard than Devcore CanderelDLS Group in their bids to redevelop LeBreton Flats.

• Ottawa Senators-backed bid top choice for LeBreton redevelopment
• LIVEBLOGRECAP: Follow along as theNCC'stop choicewas announced
• Your reaction: Senators bid top choice to redevelop LeBreton Flats
• PHOTOS:What LeBreton Flats would look like if Ottawa Senatorsget toredevelop

But that fleeting thrill was quickly overcome by a seemingly unending list of questions: What happens now? (More secret talks.) When will this all happen? (Not for a long time.) How much will all this cost? (A lot $3.5 billion, says Sens owner Eugene Melnyk.) And who's going to pay for it? (Stay tuned.)

And yet, the first question asked was how?

How did the Sens bid beat DCDLS?

More financial viability

When you re-listen to the presentation given atthe NCC on Wednesday, or read the pros and cons highlights of both bids posted on the NCC's website, it appears the DCDLSGroup didn't score as highly in the financial viability categories for their public-use anchors. They had proposed a number of attractions, such as a Canadian Broadcasting Centre, abrewery museum, a botanical garden walkwayand a striking central library.

The problem was that DCDLSdidn't appear to have any confirmed tenants. For example, while Molson's had privately told the consortium it was interested in a museum, the beer conglomerate told the media in no uncertain terms that it was not an official part of the bid.

The only anchor with a confirmed tenant was the automotive museum, which the public really seemed to dislike.

The selection committee would have liked to see "moresupportive information on the financial viability of the public anchor uses."

Now, the jury used similar language for the RendezVous bid when it came to that group's public anchors of an Abilities Centre and SensPlex. But the Sens group also seemed to benefit from the fact that they have built SensPlexes before (although not on the scale proposed for LeBreton) and that an Abilities Centre has already been established in Whitby, Ont., showing that theseare "proven models."

AndRendezVous likely scored higher due to the factthe Sens was"an existing viable entity," which would be the major tenant of the arena.

So did RendezVous win because it was the Senators' team? In a sense, yes. But not because the five-member selection committee was bowing to some sort of public pressure.(In fact, it's not clear from the public consultation report that the public even liked the idea of an arena being the focal point of the site.)

But RendezVous scored higher because the Sens are a confirmed tenant for one of the three public anchors (and the other two sound doable).

Better planning, sustainability

Despite the fact RendezVous' plan for an arena in the centre of the site means it will be 500 metres from either Pimisi or Bayview LRT stations while Devcore Canderel's group proposed connecting their arena directly to Bayviewstation the jury preferred the placement in the RendezVous plan. The selection team believes the events centre (with a promised 170 events a year) and adjacent large public square could bring "civiclife" back to the area.

The committee also liked the way RendezVous' build out was divided into distinct sections, with flow-through streets and a plan to cover the LRT tracks, all of whichpromise to make the flats more walkable and bicycle-friendly. The juryalso applauded the proposal to certify large buildings LEED Gold,install a green roofon the arena, and, in particular, includeaffordable housing (with official bid partner Centretown Citizens Ottawa Corp.).

This all added to the "social sustainability" of the site.

On the other hand, the jury didn't like that all the public anchors in the DCDLS bidwere groupedtogether apart from residences and shops. It criticized the plan's hugecity blocks that would hinder the walkability of the area (although fewer streets would reduce the presence of cars).

The selection committee also notedthe light-rail tracks act as a barrier to pedestrians travelling north-south. It liked DCDLS'snon-anchor uses like a YMCA, student and senior housing, a grocery store and elementary school, but still felt "theproposal would have benefited from a firmer commitment to sustainability standards."

Changes likely to current proposal

For those of us who were surprised that RendezVouscame out on top, the biggest question is how a proposallargely centredaround an events centre fits the bill for "an anchor worthy of national significance," to quote the NCC's own request for proposals.

Kristmansondidn't exactly answer that when asked by CBC reporter Kate Porter, but acknowledged the public was divided on wanting something of a greater national stature than a hockey arena, or havingLeBreton Flatsre-integrated into the surrounding neighbourhood.

"I think this proposal through negotiation can be pushed both ways to raise its national importance and to make it ... a real part of the Centretown urban fabric," said Kristmanson.

"I'll be looking for ways to lift that national prominence."

Well, that'll be interesting.

Kristmanson'scomments giveusan indicationabout just how difficult and long these negotiations will be. (The NCC board is expecting an update in November.)

Other changes the NCC will be asking for? Likely less housing and less retail, as the committee complained there was too much of each. But these are also the money-making parts of the plan, so it's far from clear how viable it is to reduce these elements.

Taxpayers on the hook?

There are still a lot of unanswered unasked, even questions about who will pay for what.

Social media is abuzz with folks worried (or warning) that we'll be shelling out money to theSens for this project.It is unlikely there's politicalappetite for a direct handout toa professional sports organization. But what aboutsome sort ofproperty tax deal? Former Sens owner Rod Brydennegotiated one with the city back in 2000, so it hasbeen done.

How about soil remediation? The city has a program that pays for half of dirty-soilclean-upcosts. In fact,council just approved shelling out $15 million to remediatethe former Oblates land in Old Ottawa East. Will we be on the hook for millions and millions for LeBreton?

The jury loved RendezVous'sidea to cover the LRT tracks with a roadway. How will that work, considering thatlight rail is expected to be completed in 2018, well before this deal is even finalized?Would covering the LRT be technically feasible at that point? And would the city have to incur any costs? The same two questions apply to RendezVous' plans for the Heritage Aqueduct.

It appearsthe NCC was definitely right about at least one thing: this is just the beginning of a long, long process.