What Ontario's urban boundary reversal means for Ottawa - Action News
Home WebMail Monday, November 11, 2024, 01:08 AM | Calgary | -0.5°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
OttawaCBC Explains

What Ontario's urban boundary reversal means for Ottawa

Controversial expansions to Ottawa's urban boundary are being scrapped by the Ford government, but councillors say rolling back plans already in motion will not be easy or cheap and builders stress that could impede the city from reaching its housing goals.

A 'huge win' to some local politicians is a 'difficult decision' for Ottawa builders

Farm land in the fall shown from above. A silver farm house.
This farmland on Watters Road in Orlans is one of several plots that will be removed from the official plan as part of the rollback of the province's urban boundary expansion. (Michel Aspirot/CBC Radio-Canada)

Some Ottawacouncillorsare applauding the Ford government's scrapping of a controversial expansionto Ottawa's urban boundary,while suggesting the late move could prove both costly and complicated.

Ontario Housing Minister Paul Calandraannounced Monday that provincial changes to the city's official planwill be reversedafter an investigation found "too much involvement from the minister's office."

In Ottawa, that means the 654-hectare expansion pushed on the city by then-housing minister Steve Clark is no more.

The major increase in land available for development included agricultural land andwas done without consultation, prompting politicians to call it a recipe for expensive urban sprawl.

The planned expansion included a contentious plot of land on Watters Road that had never been part of the city's expansion discussions, and which was found to have been sold in 2021 to a group made upof Progressive Conservative party donors.

Where is the affected land?

The province's modifications to Ottawa's official planboosted the expanded urban boundaryfrom more than 1,200 hectares to over 1,900, opening up areas in the east, south and west to more development.

A map that shows the urban expansion areas approved by the City of Ottawa, and later, by the Ontario government.
Each of the dark red parcels of land in this map were added by the province in 2022. The provincial housing minister says that decision will be rolled back. (Neil Joyes/CBC)

All 654 hectares will now be removed from the document, including large swaths east of Findlay Creek, in South March and near thefuture Bowesville LRT.

Orlans MPP StephenBlaiscalled the reversal a "huge win" for Ottawa residents, making specific mention of the 37 hectares of farmland in his riding, which the city had considered too valuable an agricultural resource to lose.

What other changes tothe official plan are being rolled back?

Calandra said new legislation willroll back all aspects of the Ontario changes to the official plan, "except in circumstances where construction has begun or where doing so would contravene existing provincial legislation and regulation."

That could include the province changing allowable building heights, including an increasefrom fourto nine storeys along"minor corridors" in the downtown core.

A man with a beard stands in front of a map with yellow hardhat beside him
Jason Burggraaf, executive director of the Greater Ottawa Homebuilders' Association, says he hopes the city will consider keeping some of the additional land to allow for more housing. (Jean Delisle/CBC)

"That's really going to impact Ottawa's intensification plans," saidJason Burggraaf, the executive director of the Greater Ottawa Home Builders' Association."It's a difficult decision to see happen."

Coun. Glen Gower, a member of the planning committee and chair of thetransit commission, said it should also restore wording surrounding 15-minute cities that was weakened by the province for instance, replacing the word "must"with "should."

A statement from the City of Ottawa saidstaff have reached out to the provinceto get more information related tothe announcementand what it means for the city.

Can the reversal be reversed?

While the province mayclosethe door on its official plan involvement, a window of opportunity has opened for the city to maintain certain changes.

Municipalities have 45 days to update ministry staff to "submit changes and updates" to what was approved by council prior to Ontario's involvement.

That could allow newly electedcouncillors, who were not part of initial deliberations, to weigh in.

Calandra said projects that "are already underway" mayalso be exempted.

'Too much involvement' from former Ontario housing ministers office in boundary changes, Calandra says

11 months ago
Duration 1:13
In November 2022, Premier Doug Ford's government ordered the expansion of some cities municipal boundaries, instantly turning certain parcels of agricultural land from rural to urban. Housing Minister Paul Calandra now says the government will reverse those expansions after "too much involvement" from then-Housing Minister Steve Clarks office.

Burggraafsaid putting housing on the expanded boundary lands would take five to 10 years, but developers have likely already done substantial planning work that should not be discounted.

"I really want to make sure that the city looks at those decisions very closely and does what's best for future residents," he said.

What about the city's costs?

The cityhas alreadyput a year of work into mapping out how its policies adhere to the modifiedofficial plan, which includes providing services to those 654 hectares of undeveloped lands.

"For example, next week we have our infrastructure master plan that's coming in front of committee and council," said Gower."It's setting out the capital planning for wastewater, and drinking water, and stormwater."

Coun. Shawn Menardsaid the late decision will havea very real impact on the city's finances, given the amount of time staff have spent to craft that 233-page document in a way that includes the new greenfield projects.

Several municipalities have already reached out to the province for reimbursement related to the Greenbelt reversal. Calandrasaid Ontario would"assist" municipalities with related planning and staffing costs.

A man in a collared shirt and glasses poses for a photo indoors.
Coun. Shawn Menard says this decision does not allay his concerns about how lands were added to the urban boundary expansion. (Jean Delisle/CBC)

How does this affect Ottawa housing goals?

The city has signed on to a 10-year goal from the province to add 151,000 units to the housing supply over the next decade, with provincial funding tied to meeting those targets.

The actual pace of development has, so far, fallen well short.

"If we cut off those pieces of land, then we're really impeding ourselves from reaching our targets," said Burggraaf.

Menard disagrees, arguing the city shouldfocuson intensification within urban areas that wouldbe cheaper in the long run and support the city's environmental and affordability goals.

Will land deals still be investigated?

Weeks before Calandra's announcement, Menardand 10 other councillors called on Ontario's auditor general and integrity commissioner to investigate Ottawa's urban boundary expansion as thoroughly as it did lands in the GTA.

This announcement doesn't change his view.

"Obviously you can't just say'OK, we're reversing it,so it's done,'" he said."There were bad decisions made there."

Menard said the auditor general's office has responded to say it's looking into it.

Provincial opposition members signed on to the call, with interim Liberal leaderJohn Fraser, who represents the riding of Ottawa South, questioning if the WattersRoad property passes the smell test.

This property was added to Ottawa by Ford's government. That's prompting calls for an investigation

12 months ago
Duration 1:19
The Ford government added this farmland on Watters Road in Orleans to the urban boundaries of Ottawa, against the wishes of city council. Opposition MPPs say the move tripled the value of the land and are calling for an investigation. (Michel Aspirot/CBC Radio-Canada)

How do we know this won't happen again?

Both Menard and Gower hope lessons will be learned from this experience.

"[The province needs]to make sure that if they're gonna do that, it's gotta go back to those cities.Make sure there's consultation. Make sure there's [a] full breadth of information,"said Menard. "In this case, that wasn't done."

The province's modifications were not subject to appeal, which Gower said raises concerns about transparency and accountability.

"As long as there are these gaps or holes in the policy process, I think there's still a risk that we could end up with problems in the future."

With files from Arthur White-Crummey