Regina council approves plan for $245M aquatic centre - Action News
Home WebMail Friday, November 22, 2024, 03:49 PM | Calgary | -10.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Saskatchewan

Regina council approves plan for $245M aquatic centre

An outgoing city council has approved a budget for the project and reaffirmed a plan that will demolish the aging Lawson aquatic centre once the construction of the new facility is complete.

Promise made by Mayor Sandra Masters during last civic election now close to reality

A woman in a black blazer stands in front of a posterboard with the word Aquatics on it.
Regina Mayor Sandra Masters welcomed council's decision. Masters had made the construction of a new aquatic centre a central part of her successful bid for mayor in 2020. (Alexander Quon/CBC)

Regina city council is moving forward with the construction of$245-million aquatic centre at the former Taylor Field lands.

In a 9-2 vote Wednesday, council approved a budget for the project and reaffirmed a plan that will demolish the aging Lawson aquatic centre once the construction of the new facility is complete.

"It is clear that this is the facility we need to build," saidWard 1 Coun. CherylStadnichuk. "It is a generational facility that we are going to be building."

The new aquatic centre will be the first indoor pool built in Regina since the Sandra Schmirler Centre was opened in 1990.

Replacing the Lawson has been in the works for more than a decade.

Mayor Sandra Masters made it a central part ofher successful campaignin 2020. After the council vote, she said she's happy the project will soon become reality.

"Swimming pools are one of those things that are one of the lowest-barrier activities that folks can take part in," Masters said.

A preliminary budget for the project was pegged at nearly$161millionwhen first passed in 2023.Updated numbers provided earlier thisyear indicated thecost of the project had increased by$85 million, split between inflationary costs on construction and design scope clarity.

Instead of the $81.5 million the city was originally projected to be responsible for, the cost increase means the city's required contribution is$139.6 million.

The plan passed Wednesday will use $128 million in funding from a federal government infrastructure program.

Effort to shrink scope fails

A last-gasp effort by Ward 4 Coun. Lori Brescianito change the course of the project was never put to a vote.

Bresciani hadadvocated for reducing thescope of the long-planned aquatic facility due to the surging costs.

Instead of building the current proposed facility, Bresciani suggested spending $61 million to renovate theLawson.The proposal would have also considered other locations to build a new pool, with the hope of securing more funding from the provincial or federal governments.

"I don't think it hurts to go and ask the questions as to what other funding is out there for regional economic [dollars]. If there isan option to have two pools, I think it's better than one," said Bresciani.

City staff have previously told council that upgrading the Lawson could cost much more than $60 million, especially if they want to extend its lifespan before the projected five years it has left. Renovations could require the facility to be closed as long as two years, staff said.

Groups eager for a new aquatic centre pushed back on Bresciani'sproposal.

"Firstly, we are not living in reality if we think the Lawson can be renovated for the dollar figure and time frame being suggested," said Tracy Moser of theRegina Piranhas Summer Swim Club.

Other advocates voiced concerns that renovating the Lawson would deprive them of much-needed pool space.

"A city this size without a real pool is illogical, ridiculous and unfathomable,"saidJacob Korpan, a coach for the Regina Masters Swim Club and Captain of the University of Regina Swim Team.

"This awful idea must be quashed and the [indoor aquatic facility]must go ahead for the best interest and well-being of current and future [residents]."

Bresciani ultimatelyconcluded she could not get enough support for her plan and did not put it on the floor.

Only Bresciani and Ward 10 Coun. Landon Mohl voted against the proposal passed by council.

Burden on taxpayer yet to be decided

Council's votemeans the city will usedebt to fund the extra cost.

One option to pay for thatdebt would be aone-time dedicated 2.7 per cent increase to the mill rate,which determines thetax per dollar of a property's assessed value, expressed in "mills." That would workout to $65 a year for the average household.

Another optioncouncil is considering is a dedicated 0.5 per cent mill rate increase phased in over five years. That would work out to an additional $12 peryear forthe average household for five years.

That will be a decision made by the incoming city council. At least six wards will have new faces after the municipal election set for Nov. 13.

Masters says she hopes the city will get shovels in the ground on the aquatics project in 2025.