Where does Sask.'s future premier stand on legal cannabis, the GTH?

As the race to fill Brad Wall's shoes as the leader of the Saskatchewan Party, and premier of the province,approaches its final month, CBCis compilinga roundup of where candidates stand on keyissues.

Here's what the five candidates in the race one of whom will lead the province after Jan. 27 think about legalization of recreational cannabis use and the controversy around the Global Transportation Hub.

Pot legalization

The federal government has said it wants to see the sale and recreational use of cannabis legalized by July 1 of next year, but it's left many of the details around regulation up to the provinces.

Ken Cheveldayoff says he's the candidatemost opposed to the sale of legal cannabis in Saskatchewan. He wants a minimum age of 25for the purchase of cannabis once that becomes legal.

"Some people say, 'Well, it should be the same [age] as alcohol,' and I've talked to some teachers who said if we have alcohol to do all over again, it would probably be 25 as well," he told CBC in November.

Tina Beaudry-Mellor wants the legal age for pot to be 19, the same as alcohol.

"I'm going to advocate for this. We are a free-enterprise party," she said about cannabis legalization during a party debate in Swift Current, Sask., on Oct. 20.

"Licensing for growth, production and sales would be a request-for-proposal process to private sector entities that have the capacity to provide safety standards and quality assurance to medicinal and recreational dispensaries," she said in a campaign statement.

Alanna Koch said the federal government has "rushed" through its cannabislegislation.

"The Trudeau Liberals did not allow enough time for the provinces to prepare properly for legalization therefore; we must work hard to guarantee the safety of the Saskatchewan people," her campaign website states.

Gord Wyantsaid during the Oct. 20 debate the province needs more time and resources to prepare for legalization. During his time as justice minister, he penned a letter to Ottawa expressing '"real concerns" about the federal government's legislation.

He also said setting the legal age of consumption at 25 when the legal drinking age is 19 would be counterproductive.

Scott Moecalled for more time from Ottawa in order to prepare for the effects of cannabis legalization and said the request to share tax revenue from pot sales is "disturbing."

"The provinces will need that taxation to ensure that we're able to keep this out of the hands of our children, to ensure that we're able to enforce and keep our streets safe and keep our industries safe here in the province."

Global Transportation Hub

The Global Transportation Hub has been a source of controversy since an RCMPinvestigation was launched in the spring of 2016, after CBCbroke the story about a series of land transactions that saw two politically well-connected businessmen make millions on land that wound up in the hands of the government.

Ken Cheveldayoffsays if he were elected, he wouldsell the GTHinto the hands of the private sector.

"I believe we would be able to demonstrate to Saskatchewan residents that their tax dollars would be recovered," he said in a campaign statement issued in September.

Former attorney general GordWyantsaid he would call a public inquiry into the province's role in the multimillion-dollar land deal.

"I think it's very important that the people of Saskatchewan get the answers that they deserve on this matter," Wyantsaid back in September.

Tina Beaudry-Mellor said she supports a judicial inquiry into the GTHland deal.

"I believe it is important the RCMP investigation that is currently underway be allowed to complete its work before an inquiry is launched," she said in a campaign statement.

Scott Moe said he wouldn't stand in the way of an audit or public inquiry, but would decide what to do after the RCMPcompletes its investigation and the findings are made public.

Alanna Koch recentlytold CBCRadio'sBlue Skythat "with respect to the public inquiry, I've indicated that I want to see the results of the RCMP investigation.

"Let's wait and see what occurs as a result of that investigation and then we would take appropriate action from there," she said, adding a public inquiry would be time consuming and costly to taxpayers.