SGI training more drug recognition experts, despite concerns testing is 'highly subjective'

Saskatchewan Government Insurance is standing by a plantotrainmore drug recognition experts in the lead-up to marijuana legalization, despite concerns being raised that the tests these officers administer may be flawed.

"SGIis paying for more drug recognition experts," said JoeHargrave, the minister responsible for the Crown corporation.

• Like 'flipping a coin': Why it's so hard to test drivers for pot
• With legal pot looming, Sask. to get tough on drug-impaired drivers

There are currently 74 trained drug recognition expertsin Saskatchewan, with 20 more being trained this spring in preparation for marijuana legalization.

"We'll be as ready as we can be for that. We're pushing and supplying that for all the municipalities and the RCMP to get more drug recognition experts on the streets and more field sobriety tests and experts," said Hargrave.

"That's what we need to lay the proper charges to people for impaired driving by drugs."

Reliability questioned

Some experts say it's not a reliable way of assessing impairment.

"There's a lot of contention out there about how reliable they are. They are deemed to be highly subjective," said RonPich, a defence lawyer based in Saskatoon who specializes in defending impaired driving cases.

"It's a bit of a work-in-progress and no one out there is convinced it's a fail-safe procedure."

• Sask.'s zero-tolerance policy will hurt medical marijuana users,Crohn'spatient says

When asked if these tests are scientific, Hargrave said, "it works."

"There's no machine involved in it. But these people are trained to recognize when people are impaired by drugs," he said, adding that courts recognize their expertise to testify in cases of impaired driving.

The drug recognition experts, or DREs, use a 12-step test,which involves examining a suspect's vital signs, eyes, balance and ability to concentrate.

"It's a laborious process, and I appreciate the carnage of impaired driving is something that Parliament has to address," said Pich.

"But it just strikes me that there's a lot of difficulties with this. It's very intrusive and at the end of the day, there's an element of subjective criteria that simply makes it potentially a very dangerous type of investigative tool."

• A 'significant erosion of rights': Sask. defence lawyer on proposed impaired driving laws

Criminal defence attorney MarkBrayford, though,said drug recognition experts may be the mostuseful tool Canada has at the moment to test impairment.

"Obviously a test is only as good andreliable as the skill of the officer that's doing it when it's not being done by a mechanical or electronic instrument," he said.

But he noted drug recognition expertsattempt to evaluate someone's level of impairment, unliketests that measure THC levels, which may or may not be a good indication of impairment.

Investing in DREs

According to a spokesperson for SGI, the insurerhas allocated $120,000 for training DREs since the start of 2017.

"It's not just sort of a one-day training course here that you sort of come to and get a little bit of training," said Hargrave.

"They're sent awayit's very expensive to send them away."

Training costs $3,200 to $3,500 per officer, not including the wages of the officers attending the training. SGI has already provided funding for approximately 60 of the DREs, and is funding the upcoming 20.

For Saskatchewan, the first two weeks of training are held at the RCMPdepot in Regina. Then, the candidates head to the U.S. for the practical portion of the training.

Don Morgan, Saskatchewan's minister of justice, said Wednesday that the province is lobbying the federal government to provide resources for training drug recognition experts.

• Pot money won't be considered in upcoming provincial budget, Moe says

Public Safety Canada has said it will invest up to $81 million in new law enforcement training across the country, paying to train 750 more drug recognition experts over the next five years, and to train more than 3,000 officers to administer a shortened version of the observational test known as the standardized field sobriety test.

Future technology

Pich recognized that at this point there are not a lot of alternatives for testing drivers for drug impairment, but he expects more technology to be developed to properly assess it in the future.

Healso pointed to problems with the saliva test that can be used toassess drug impairment.

"The critics out there are suggesting that some of the active ingredient in marijuana that is, the THC, the impairment ingredient has a lasting effect," saidPich.

Pichsaid this means it could trigger a false-positive test when the individual is not in fact impaired.

"As the science develops and there's a greater need, you are going to see devices and instruments that could be qualified and certified to measure more accurately the active impairing ingredient," saidPich.

"I'm not sure everything is lined up properly at this point."