Decision highlights second-hand smoke as 'legitimate' concern for Sask. tenants

Health groups in Saskatchewan are celebrating a decision by the Office of Residential Tenancies they believe provetenants have the right to live unaffected by second-hand smoke.

Three tenants complained to the office after the units they were living in, which belonged to Regina Housing Authority, were infiltrated bysecond-hand tobacco smoke from other tenants.

"This decision recognizes that second-hand smoke exposure is a legitimate complaint for tenants to make,"said lawyer CarlyRomanow, executive director of Pro Bono Law Saskatchewan.

"Because of the courage and the bravery of these tenants we were able to now have a case that says second-hand exposure can be unhealthy for tenants and they have a right to be able to live in an environment without that."

In a decision last March, the office ruled to compensate the threetenants for rentabasementand other costs associated with them having to deal with second-hand smoke. In total, the Regina Housing Authority was ordered to pay around $15,000.

An appeal of the decision was recently dismissed.

Romanowsaid this is a first-of-its-kind ruling in Saskatchewan.

Health implications

"One's right to smoke cannot impede on another's right not to smoke or breath second-hand smoke," the decision read.

Romanowexplained the tenantswere not simply annoyed by the second-hand smoke, but in fact suffered negative health effects as a result of the smoke filtering into their units.

She saidall tenants involved had documented second-hand smoke "exasperated" medical conditions, ranging from respiratory issues to some mental health health issues heightened by exposure to second-hand smoke.

Former tenant ChaseGensersaid the smoking from a tenant below his unit was "incessant." Henow lives in Winnipeg.

"It would come through the vents:the heating vents in the floor and in the main air intake vent," he said.

"It ruined my furniture, it ruined my clothes everything. I couldn't even sleep at night. It was just becoming so hard to breathe."

Impacts on cannabis legalization

Romanow said the decision broadly applies to second-hand smoke exposure from cannabis.

"It has to more than a mere annoyance," she said.

"Second-hand smoke of any kind is kind of broadly stroked in this decision and so that could be applicable then to the legalization of cannabis coming forward."