Greg Fertuck murder confession can be admitted as evidence, Saskatoon judge rules - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 09:54 PM | Calgary | 0.4°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
Saskatoon

Greg Fertuck murder confession can be admitted as evidence, Saskatoon judge rules

A Saskatoon judge has ruled a videotaped confession that Greg Fertuck made to undercover police where he described killinghis wife in 2015 can beadmittedinto evidence in his trial for first-degree murder.

Fertuck is on trial for 1st-degree murder in death of estranged wife Sheree Fertuck

man and woman
Greg Fertuck told undercover police officers he dumped his wife Sheree's body in a rural area near where he hunted deer, according to testimony from one of the officers at Fertuck's first-degree murder trial. (Greg Fertuck/Facebook)

A Saskatoon judge has ruled a videotaped confession that Greg Fertuck made to undercover police where he described killinghis wife in 2015 can beadmittedinto evidence in his trial for first-degree murder.

Fertuck is shown on the June 21, 2019, recording acting out shooting Sheree Fertuck at a gravel pit near Kenaston, Sask., four years earlier.

Sheree Fertuck vanishedon Dec. 7, 2015. The 51-year-old's body has never been found.Greg Fertuck was charged with first-degree murder in 2019.

His judge-alone trial began in September 2021 at what was then Court of Queen's Bench.

Since then, the Crown has presented its case in a voir dire, or trial within a trial. On Friday, Justice Richard Danyliukruledthat admissions Fertuck made to undercover officers may be applied to the trial proper.

The Crown's case turned on admissions Fertuck made to RCMP officers who were pretending to be criminals as part of a so-called Mr. Big sting operation. Fertuck maintained at trial that he made up the story about killing his wife because he was afraid.

The trial went through numerous delays, including Fertuckdeciding to represent himself after a falling out with his defence team in October2022 and then applying successfully to re-examine witnesses that had already been questioned.

Fertuck also slipped on a patch ofice and suffered a serious head injury midway through the RCMP sting. Thataccident promptedofficers to re-evaluate the merit of continuing.

Danyliuk'sruling hinged on whether police followed theguidelines set out by the Supreme Courton Mr. Big stings.

RCMP played out 136 structured interactions, known as scenarios, between the summer of 2018 and late spring of 2019 in the Greg Fertuck operation.

Various undercover operatorsgradually revealed to Greg a fictional criminal enterprise that featured loan sharking, corrupt border guards, stolen diamonds, vehicles and high-stakes poker games.

LISTEN | Sheree's disappearance and Greg's trial are the focus of a CBC investigative podcast calledThe Pit.Stream the latest episode now:
Greg explains why he thinks hes the victim. As witnesses are questioned again, Greg appears in court on another matter. The judge gives a stern lesson in courtroom etiquette.

It culminated in Greg making his disclosure to an undercover officer on June 21, 2019, that he killed Sheree and then dumped her body.

Fertuck'sformer lawyers cross-examinedsome of the undercover officers, focusingheavily on how well Fertuck recovered from his head injury. Whether he was of an "operating mind" when police manouevered him into the confession wasexpected to play prominently inDanyliuk's decision.

Trial not over yet

The Crown's case against Fertuckreliesheavilyon the evidence gathered in the undercover police operation.

"The evidence that was called and the law that has to be applied to it is an important area and obviously a significant test the Crown has to meet. So we are happy with the results and we look forward to the continuation of the trial," Crown prosecutor Carla Dewar said Friday.

The trial is not over yet, Dewar said, and now the Crown will determine whether any further evidence is needed.

"Everything that has been heard so far now will go in as evidence against Mr. Fertuck without having to call that evidence all over again," Dewar said."As well, Mr. Fertuck will have to decide whether he's going to call any evidence on his own behalf. So that will be the rest of the continuation of the trial."

Dewar said she hopes there will not be any further delays and things will go back on track.

"The Crown is obviously happy about the decision that was made today."