Indian Act blocks Saskatoon landlord from collecting thousands in rent

Erin Perehudoffsays a bad renter owes her money after leaving a trail of destruction and garbage at her Saskatoonhome.

It was filthy. She didn't clean anything.- Erin Perehudoff

But despite a ruling from the Office of Residential Tenancies ordering Michelle Arcand to pay $3,156.20 to her former landlord, Arcand'semployer refuses togarnishee her wages.

Arcandand her dogmoved into the brand-new home on Evergreen Boulevard in November 2014, agreeing to pay Perehudoff $1,850 a month in rent, as well as an $1800 damage deposit.

Arcand soon fell behind on rent payments, and was ordered to leave by the end of March. She never did pay the full damage deposit.

House left 'filthy'

"She left the house a mess, damages from her dog she had there," said Perehudoff. "Scratched up doors, floors, you name it, busted-up cabinets.It was filthy.She didn't clean anything."

Arcanddid not appear at ahearing on June 4 before the Rentalsman. During the hearing,Perehudoff was awarded rent arrears, as well as cleaning and costs related to repairing damage on the home. In a written decision, the Rentalsman accepted the Perehudoff's claims and photographic evidence of the damage.

But when asheriff arrived at the Saskatchewan Indian Gaming Authority (SIGA),bearing a court orderto garnishee Arcand's wages, he was rebuffed.

Citing the Indian Act, (see letter below) SIGA'slawyerBonnie Missenswrote"SIGA is unable to pay any sum due from wages or salary into court as the Defendant's wages are located on reserve land and exempt from seizure."

Section 89 ofThe Indian Actstates"the real and personal property of an Indian or a band situated on a reserve is not subject to charge, pledge, mortgage, attachment, levy, seizure, distress or execution in favour or at the instance of any person other than an Indian or a band," making illegal for anyone off-reserve to seize wages.

SIGAsaidthe situation is unusual, but gets one or two instances like this every year. SIGAsaid it advises the court that it cannot comply, and notifies the employee.

Consequences for otherFirst Nations renters

"I was appalled, I was just devastated," said Perehudoff. "I thought Canada was equal rights for everyone. And I mean when somebody owes money, I don't care what your race is or where you're from. You owe money. Simple."

Arcandhas not returnedtelephone messages, e-mails or texts from CBC.

Perehudoff said this may make landlords more cautious about accepting tenants who work on reserves.

"If you're a status Indian and someone is abusing their rights as a status Indian, doesn't that affect you?" said Perehudoff.

"I think [status Indians]need to take a stand too because that's not fair for them," she said.

Dale Beck, director of the Office of Residential Tenancies, said he had no recollection of this issue coming up before today.

"I don't know if there's any way they could have prevented this from happening in the first place," Beck said.

"They can't discriminate against a person on the basis ofethnicity because that's a contravention of the Human Rights Act."

But Beck said landlords are free to choose tenants with good credit ratings over those with poorer ratings.