Sudbury's Kingsway Entertainment District passes rezoning vote at city council

Sudbury has approved two controversial rezoning applications that could transform east-end industrial lands into a multi-million dollar entertainment district.

City council voted last night to approve rezoning applications from developer Dario Zulich,which would make way for apublicly-funded arena and a casino.

Zulich is calling it a "major step forward" for his organization, whichoriginally pitched the idea of an entertainment district to council in 2017.

"I'm proud of council's leadership," he said. "They did something that councilshaven'tdone in 20 years."

The journeyto get to this stage wasn't without its challenges. Councillor Mark Signoretti had opposed the development from the beginning, citing what he believed to be a public misconception of who is paying for the new arena, as well as the impact that development would have on the nearby Ramsey Lake watershed.

Signorettihas also questioned why city staff didn't provide council with an economic impact study on the effects this development could have on the downtown core before the decision was made.

"I think what we're doing is creatingtwo districts," Signoretti said. "I question us trying to create this new district, when we currently have an arts and culture district, we have open space, festival space."

"We have an arena that's downtown so we can see immediate impact."

'Not about the moral fabric of the community,' Kirwan says

But councillorRobert Kirwanargued thatdebating the merits of downtown versus New Sudburyfor a new arena is a lost cause, since council approved a Kingswaylocationin June2017.

"We're not here to discuss the economic impact on the city, we're not here to discuss whether it's going to have an effect on the moral fabric of the community, or the health of the community," Kirwan said.

"I think tonight we just have to look at the land use. And if we feel the application does meet the regulations and condition necessary, we should approve it and let whatever happens, happen."

Kirwanwas alludingto statements from groups who oppose the Kingswaydevelopment, including local business owner Tom Fortin, who told CBCNews his group Casino Free Sudbury will file an appeal on the rezoning decisionto theLocal Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT,) a tribunal that hears cases in relation to a range of municipal planning, financial and land matters.

University of Sudbury theologian Chris Duncanson-Hales, who represents a group of 36 local faith leaders opposingthe casino, said his group would "absolutely" appeal the decision, but gave no further comment.

Representativesfrom Gateway Casinos said that an appeal could set backconstruction of the facility by up to 8 months.

The threat of appeal through the LPATis so certain, Signorettisuggested that the city hold off on any infrastructure development in the proposed district until a final decision between the tribunal and the city can be reached.

"Councillor Kirwanis making a plea to move this forward for the citizens of Sudbury, but I want to protect the taxpayers' money," Signoretti said. "I don'twant to spend any moremoney until we knowfor sure there's going to be a casino development and a hotel, and I still don't see any proof there's going to be a hotel."

Coun. Fern Cormiersaid the rezoning of the land intended for the casino should be handled differently than plans for the arena.

"When it's private companies dealing withprivateproperties usingprivatemoney, frankly, I'm not too concerned what they do. That's Costco's business, Walmart's business, and Gateway'sbusiness."

"The largest differential here, is [the arena] is not private sector money coming to the table, it's not private enterprise.It's a municipal investment of up to $100 million that we will be responsible for," Cormier said.

In the end,SignorettiandCoun. Gerry Montpellier were the two lone voices opposing the rezoning application for the casino, which passed by a total of 11-2. The rezoning application for the arena also passed by a vote of 9-4.