Home | WebMail | Register or Login

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Sign Up

Sign Up

Please fill this form to create an account.

Already have an account? Login here.

SudburyPoll

Sliding hill risks: Ontario cities struggle with liability

The closure of a sliding hill in Sudbury has sparked debate about how to handle the unofficial outdoor activity.

Sudbury's popular Queen's Athletic field hill fenced off after serious injury last year

The city has placed an orange fence at Queen's Athletic hill in Sudbury to stop people from using it. (Megan Thomas/CBC)

The closure of a sliding hill in Sudbury has sparked debate about how to handle the unofficial outdoor activity.

The City of Greater Sudbury does not sanction sliding on any city property, but there are many popular sliding areas within city parks.

This winter, a long-used hill at Queen's Athletic field has beenhas fenced off because of a serious injury at the site last year.

It's been a popular sliding spot in Greater Sudbury for years, but the city has now fenced off the hill at Queen's Athletic Field. The CBC's Megan Thomas joined us live from the hill to talk about why sliding will no longer be allowed there.

Some cities are dealing with the risks and liability around sliding by creating sanctioned areas.

For a number of years,the City of Sault Ste. Marie has operated a sliding area atFinn Hill.

The City of Greater Sudbury does not maintain any sanctioned sliding hills. File photo. (Ches Burns)
Chief Administrative Officer Joe Fratesi saidthe municipal hill is unsupervised,but city staff do check it for safety hazards and install hay bales at the bottom to prevent injuries.

"It's listed with our insurance company. Our insurance company is aware that it is something that we do indeed sanction," he said.

"I think our insurance companies expect that we are reasonable in both providing the opportunity and reasonable in making sure that they are properly maintained is the mark that we have to achieve."

In Sudbury,the city saidit has a responsibility to keep people from sliding on city propertybecause it doesn't maintain or monitor the areas to ensure they are safe.

Doing so would require resources, andMark Signoretti doesn't think it's money well spent at this point. He's the city councillor for Ward 1,which includes Queen's Athletic field.

"I think there's a lot of areas in the community where people can take advantage of sliding. To put a staff member on and to incur costs for the city at this time, I don't think it's in the best interest," he said, adding the severity of the slope and proximity to the skating oval make the Queen's Athletic hill a higher-riskspot for sliding.

The City of Sudburysaidit will be putting up signs warning against sliding in other popular areason municipal property, but so farno other fences have gone up.

Plan ahead and make the most of your Family Day long weekend. (AP)
The City of Hamilton has taken a more extreme approach to tobogganing on city property. It has a city-wide ban and fines of up to $105 for zipping down a city hill. No person has ever being fined for sledding, officials report.

The citysays its bylaw is more for public safety and to prevent any legal issues that could arise. A 2008 Ontario study by Dr. Charles Tator, aconcussion brain injury expert, found the activity ranks among one of the most deadly recreational activities, in terms of fatalities per population.