Multi-million-dollar lawsuits filed over fatal Wanapitei boat crash

The families of those killed in a boat crash on LakeWanapiteithree years ago are now suing each other, as well asGreater Sudbury emergency services, alleging the rescue wasn't fast enough.

It wasCanada Day weekend 2013, andfour friends Michael Kritz, Matthew Humeniuk, Rob Dorzek and Stephanie Bertrand spent a day together at a camp on Gavin Island on Lake Wanapitei.

That night they decided to get into a boat and go to a party on the other side of the lake. It crashed into an island and Dorzek was the lone survivor.

A lawsuit filed by Dorzek and the estate of his late common-law girlfriend Stephanie Bertrandclaims that Michael Kritz"acquired, offered and supplied dozens of alcoholic beverages, including bottles of beer, to his guests" and "turned a 'blind-eye' to the excessive consumption of alcohol" when he suggested they get in the boat and that Humenuik drive.

The suit also claims that the owner of the camp, Michael's father James Kritz, was negligent.

The Dorzeksuit, which is seeking $5.5 million in damages,also names Greater Sudbury police, fire and ambulance services, as well as individual supervisors and dispatchers who were working that night.

It claims that emergency services staff failed to arrange for a proper and timely rescue and that Bertrand"failed to receive necessary medical attention" before her injuries became fatal. She died a week later in hospital.

The suit recounts how Dorzekcalled 911 several times and was advised to light a signal fire, which spread to the boat, which has caused Dorzek"immense emotional anguish, distress and trauma as a result of the inexcusable delay."

Dorzekcontinues to lobby the province to reconsider holding a coroner's inquest into what happened that night.

The Kritz family is joining Dorzek'sclaim against the city, but is also counter-suing him for $1 million.

Their suit argues that Michael Kritz was not a "social host" that day, that the other three brought their own alcoholic drinks and that the party and the decision to get into the boat was a "joint venture."

The Kritzfamily also argues that the naming of James in the lawsuit just because he owned the camp and the boat is"frivolous, vexatious and abuse of process."

The cross-claim also alleges that Dorzek failed to rescue Michael Kritz from the boat orfollow the instructions of emergency dispatchers, improperly lighting a signal fire where there was a chance it would spread to the boat.

The court documents allege that Dorzek"focused solely on his own wellbeing and that of Ms.Bertrandwithout making any further attempt to rescue Mr. Kritz," even though he "had confirmed and knew that Mr.Kritzwas still alive."

None of the lawyers involved in the case responded to requests for comment, but itcould be months, even years, before the court decides whose version of what happened that night is the truth.