Lake Superior toxic sludge cleanup options require millions

Dozens of people gathered at a public meeting Wednesday night to hear the cleanup options for a 22-hectare patch of toxic sediment in Thunder Bay's harbour.

Decades of pulp and paper mill pollution caused the mercury-contaminated mess, and it will take years and millions of dollars to fix it.

Current River resident Murray Milne still needs to consider all the options, but he's leaning toward total removal of the toxic sediment from the harbour.

"I would like to see it gone. That would be the only way to guarantee that it wouldn't have to be monitored or maybe further deterioration in the future."

Dredging or excavating the sediment are permanent solutions. Dredging would cost $40-$50 million, and excavating $80-90 million.

Another option capping would cost $30-$40 million, and involves covering the contamination with clean material and a strong fabric barrier.

Who will pay?

Whatever the decision, it's unclear who will pay the local share of the expense.

"A lot of the projects are one-third federal, one-third provincial and one-third from the industries. The problem here is those industries no longer exist, said Jean Hall-Armstrong, who co-chairs the project's public advisory committee.

Environment Canada has committed to paying the federal portion, and will help figure out who else pays once the community decides which cleanup option to take.

"Environment Canada has a mandate to deal with contaminated sediment sites in the Great Lakes, said Environment Canadas Roger Santiago. And what we follow is a structure where we'll provide one-third of the funding to have these sites remediated."

He said the polluter usually pays a portion, but, in this case, the sediment accumulated over decades from a pulp and paper mill that had various owners.

About 40 people attended the public meeting at Lakehead University, including members of the general public, members of the Remedial Action Plan's Public Advisory Committee, representatives from Environment Canada, Ecosuperior, Resolute Forest Products, and Richardson Elevator, which is located across from the polluted site.

Markham-based Cole Engineering presented the options.

No matter what is decided upon, an estimated seven-year time line will exist around the project. Extensive public consultations need to be completed before a decision is made. After that, another two years will be required for design, six months for tender, three years for construction, and then six months will be required for verification and project close-out.

EcoSuperior will hold another public information session about the harbour contamination on Thursday night at the Prince Arthur Hotel, between 4-8 p.m.