Home | WebMail |

      Calgary | Regions | Local Traffic Report | Advertise on Action News | Contact

Thunder Bay

Sixties Scoop means 'going through life not knowing who you are', Thunder Bay man says

A man from Thunder Bay, who was part of what is known as the Sixties Scoop, says he's looking for a court ruling in a class action suit similar to the residential school settlement.

William Campbell was adopted 3 times, left searching for his family

William Campbell, 46, says he was traumatized by his childhood which included being taken from his parents in Beaverhouse First Nation and having his name changed four times through three separate adoptions.

A man from Thunder Bay, who was part of what is known as theSixties Scoop, says he's looking for a court ruling similar to the residential school settlement.

William Campbell is part of a $1.3-billionclass action lawsuit heard Tuesday in an Ontario court.

It alleges as many as 16,000 Indigenous children were deliberately taken from their parents and placed with non-native families by Ontario child welfare officialsin the 1960s, 70s and 80s.

"As we know with the residential school apology, most residential school survivors got $10,000," Campbell said. "I was adopted three times...having to go through life with nobody and not knowing who you are and where you came from is a detrimental, traumatizing event in a person's life."

Campbell said it took him 38 years to find his family at BeaverhouseFirst Nation, near Kirkland Lake, the same community where the lead plaintiff in the case,Marcia Brown Martel,is now chief.

By the time Campbellmade it back homehis parents had died but hewas able to connect with other members of his family.

"It makes you feel more complete," he said of finding his relatives.

Still, thepain of his "stolen childhood" lingers and the court case drags on. It began seven years ago.

Canada has previously tried to have the case thrown out. Among other things, Ottawaarguedit was acting in the bestinterests of the children and within the social norms of the day.

However, Divisional Court ruled in December 2014 that the plaintiffsdeserved a chance to argue the merits of their position at trial.

Thelawyer for the plaintiffsasked the court todecide the case based on the evidence already submitted,withoutthe need for a full trial.

Those hearings began yesterday and are scheduled to resume for two days on Dec. 1.

"The Canadian government needs to wrap their heads around this," Campbellsaid. "It's time to put it to bed."