This Ojibway man served his sentence, then says the Crown tried to put strict conditions on his release

Aman from an Ojibway First Nation in northwestern Ontario says Crown lawyers wrongfully tried to impose unnecessarily strict conditions on his release from jail.

Shaldon Wabason, who's from Whitesand First Nation, and his lawyers say prosecutors in Thunder Bay attempted to usea little-known legal tool a peace bond application under Sec. 810.2of the Criminal Code to impose those restrictions,despite the fact he hadalready served his full sentence in 2021.

In March 2023, Wabason arrived at the Thunder Bay Courthouse for what he hoped would be the final time dealing withthe justice system, after a decade of fighting for fair judicial proceedings.The attempt to place a peace bond on himwas dropped.

But now, thecase has lawyers and corrections researchers questioningwhether provincial attorneys generalare using the legal tool disproportionately on Indigenous people. They're also calling for answers and transparency from OntarioAttorney General Doug Downey.

Wabason, 31,and his lawyers say they're coming forward now to raise awareness about Sec. 810.2and its possible repercussions.

Shaldon's journey is not only a story about Shaldon, but it's a story of the way Indigenous people are treated by the criminal justice system compared to the way white people are treated.- Devin Bains, lawyer for Shaldon Wabason

In 2015, Wabasonwas wrongfully convicted of break and enter and manslaughter in the 2011 death ofThunder Bay residentRobert Topping and sentenced to 10 years in jail. He successfully appealed the decisionand the sentence, and later pleaded guilty in 2019 to criminal negligence causing death.

Wabasonalso fought in 2014 to have a representative jury, arguing the jury roll in Thunder Bay doesn't adequately represent First Nations people living on reserve.

"Shaldon's position always was that he never entered the house that the most he did was kick down a doorand not know anything about what happened inside. There was very powerful evidence to show that he was 100 per cent correct," said lawyer Devin Bains, who represented Wabason for most of the past 10 years.

In 2020, Wabason was denied parole and had to serve the remainder of his sentence, Bains said.

Notably, a second Indigenous man charged in the same 2011 death also had to serve his entire sentence. However, a white man convicted of the most serious offence related to the murder of Topping was released on parole and bail multiple times over the last few years, despite having committeda number of additional serious offences.

"Shaldon's journey is not only a story about Shaldon, but it's a story of the way Indigenous people are treated by the criminal justice system compared to the way white people are treated," Bains said.

What a Sec.810.2 peace bond is all about

Just two days before Wabason's sentence was about to end in February 2021 and he was to be released, he was served with a Criminal Code Sec.810.2 application filed by a Thunder Bay police officer who identified him as "a potential risk to the public," Bainssaid.

The legal tool allows a person to request a peace bond in court,if they reasonably fear a dangerous person will seriously injure another person, said Mary Campbell,a retireddirector general of a federal unit that focused on law reform. Campbell alsoledateam that created the 810.2 peace bond applicationin the 1990s.

A peace bond is a court order that lays conditions such as a curfew, restrictions from owning firearmsor requirements to stay a certain distance from some people on someone to keep the peace.

"It's a pretty heavy tool with a legitimate concern behind it," Campbellsaid. "There are people out in the community who clearly pose a threat, but a lot depends on how it's used and the conditions imposed."

To keep the use of 810.2 peace bondsin check, Campbell said it requires provincial attorneys generalto sign off on them. But there is little public data or evidence about how thesepeace bonds have been used over the past 30 years, she said.

Refusing to enter into a peace bond could result in a one-year jail sentence, Campbell said. If someone has a previous offence and they refuse to enter apeace bond, they could be sentenced for up to two years.

Breaching peace bond conditions could resultin further penalties, including incarceration of up to four years, she said.

The conditions for Wabason's release were very strict, Bains said, but more importantly, they symbolizedhe was "too dangerous to be free."

Peace bonds a 'slippery slope' to life in prison

If Wabasonhad agreed to the 810.2 peace bond, he would have beenagreeing thathe was dangerous to society, which Bains said is the first step to being labelled a dangerous offender whichcarries an indeterminate jail sentence.

"The minute you're on those [810.2] conditions, you are on a slippery slope that threatens to take away your freedom for the rest of your life," Bains said.

WATCH | Lawyer explains why Shaldon Wabason fought the 810.2 peace bond application:

Devin Bains says his client Shaldon Wabason didn't see himself as a danger to the community

1 year ago

Duration 1:48

The lawyer for Shaldon Wabason, Devin Bains, says his client fought the Criminal Code Section 810.2 peace bond application because he found it dehumanizing to be seen as a danger to the community.

Instead, Wabason fought the peace bond applicationand was released on bail in 2021 while the legal process was taking place.

In March, a lawyer with the provincial Crown dropped the 810.2 application, saying "it is no longer in the public interest for us to advance this prosecution."

However, other Indigenous offenders often feel they can'tfight such applicationsbecause "they're desperate to get out [of jail]," Bains said.

Apparent pattern ofmore bonds on Indigenous people

During that March hearing, lawyer Jonathan Rudin presented data from Legal Aid Ontario that showed a concerning pattern 810.2 peace bond applications being disproportionately brought against Indigenous people.

Rudinalso represents Wabason asco-counsel with Bains.

Rudin shared the data with CBC News. It showsthat in the last 10 years, Legal Aid Ontario (LAO) helped 83people in the province fight 810.2 applications. That doesn't include the number of peoplewhoentered the peace bond without fighting the conditions, which happens often, Rudin said.

Roughly 35 per cent of the people whoreceived legal assistance to fight those peace bond applications were Indigenous, according to the LAO data. That'ssignificantly higher than the proportion of Indigenous people about 20 to 25 per cent whoreceive financial assistance from the LAO, Rudin said.

WATCH | Rudin explains his concerns overuse of Sec.810.2 peace bond applications:

Lawyer Jonathan Rudin explains his concerns with the use of Section 810.2 peace bonds

1 year ago

Duration 1:15

A recent criminal court case of a First Nations man highlights potential problems with the way Criminal Code Section 810.2 applications are disproportionately used against Indigenous people, contributing to disproportionate representation in the criminal justice system. Lawyer Jonathan Rudin explains his concerns with the use of this legal tool.

Indigenous people make up just four per cent of the total Canadian population, butrepresent nearly 30 per cent of the total number of people in federal custody, according to a 2019 report from Statistics Canada.

"Indigenous people get the sharpest end of the justice and correctional stick. They get the most punishment, they are the most overrepresented all through the system and it doesn't help make for safer communities," Rudin said.

Howard Sapers, who previously served as the federal correctional investigator from 2004 to 2016, agreed with Rudin's assessment.

In 1999, the Supreme Court recognized Indigenous people were overrepresented in Canadian jails, in large part because of systemic racism that sees Indigenous people treated differently by the justice system.

The Gladue ruling called for sentencing judges to consider the influence of factorslike residential schools, the Sixties Scoop and the child welfare system on Indigenous offenders, in an effort to decrease the disproportionate number of Indigenous people in custody.

But in the more than 20 years since, Sapers said, it's only become worse.

"If there's been any change, it's that it's become more dramatic," he said.

To turn this tide, Sapers said, decades of commissions, investigations and academic research have offered possible solutions chief among them is empowering Indigenous communities to control their own justice systems.

But Canada needs to do a complete review at how it administers and structures the justice system, Sapers added, including the overuse of pretrial custody and large numbers of people on remand.

"Seven or eight out of 10 people who will sleep in a jail cell tonight have not been convicted of anything, and what we know about those jail populations is that they are overwhelmingly Indigenous."

Seven or eight out of 10 people who will sleep in a jail cell tonight have not been convicted of anything.- Howard Sapers, former federal correctional investigator

Rudin called on Ontario's attorney general to conduct a serious review of how 810.2 peace bond applications are being used, and if Gladue principles are employedto evaluate the proposed applications.

If theprovinceused Gladue principles when reviewing Wabason's case, Rudin saidhebelievesthey would have determined the 810.2 application was unnecessary, saving the justice system time, money andresources, andallowing "Wabason to move on with his life without this hanging over his head for many years."

CBC News requested an interview with Downey, but did not receive a response.

A statement from the Ministry of the Attorney General said the power to approve 810.2 peace bond applications has been delegated to the deputy director of high-risk offenders, the director of Crown law office (criminal) and the assistant deputy attorney general (criminal law division).

The ministry could not answer questions about how many 810.2 applications are filed, and said they do not track the ethnicity of people subject to the applications, according to the statement.