Enterprise charges customer more than $3,300 for damage incurred after truck returned - Action News
Home WebMail Sunday, November 10, 2024, 06:20 PM | Calgary | 0.9°C | Regions Advertise Login | Our platform is in maintenance mode. Some URLs may not be available. |
TorontoGO PUBLIC

Enterprise charges customer more than $3,300 for damage incurred after truck returned

Enterprise Rent-A-Car told a Toronto man he was on the hook for more than $3,300 for damage that happened after he dropped off a truck after hours. A consumer advocate and lawyer says car rental giants need to verbally spell out unexpected terms if they want them to be enforceable.

Lawyer says rental vehicle giants cant use fine print, questionable evidence to hold customers responsible

Samuel Wardlaw was told to drop the keys through a slot after returning a rented truck to a Toronto location of Enterprise Rent-A-Car. A week later, the company claimed he was responsible for more than $3,300 in damages that occurred after hed returned the vehicle. (Craig Chivers/CBC)

Samuel Wardlawexpected to pay $200 for his truck rental. Instead, Enterprise Rent-A-Car added more than$3,300 to his bill for damage that occurred after he dropped it off.

He'd only used the truck for five hours, to move some belongings to his new apartment.

But a week later, an unexpected email from therental giant said he was responsible for damage that occurred on the Enterprise lot after hours.

The email didn't explain what had happened or why he was responsible but it struck fearinWardlaw, 29, a delivery driver for a lumber company.

"I was anxious about what the price was going to be,"he said. "So to see over $3,300 in damage? I was totally shocked."

Enterprise said later that, after Wardlaw parked the truck and put the keys in a secure drop box, as instructed by an employee,someone stole its catalytic converter, a part of the exhaust system that contains valuablemetals.

Enterprise pointed to a clause on page 7 of its rental contract that says drivers who drop off a vehicle after hours are responsible for any damage or theft until it's checked in by an employee.

"It's their truck, their lot, their catalytic converter. Everything about it is within Enterprise's control," said Wardlaw. "For them to say it's my liability is pretty ridiculous."

After Go Public got involved, Enterprise said in an email it had "decided not to pursue the claim."

The company did not explain why and said no one was available for an interview.

Go Public has checked the terms and conditions for the three major companies that account for an estimated 95 per cent of all car rentals in Canada:Enterprise (which owns National and Alamo), Avis (which owns Budget) and Hertz (which owns Dollar and Thrifty).

All the contracts contain similar clauses, claiming drivers are responsible for any damage or theft from the time they drop off a vehicle until it is checked back in.

An employee at this Enterprise location in north Toronto told Wardlaw he could drop off a truck after hours. Wardlaw says there was no mention that hed be responsible for the truck until it got checked back in almost two days later. (Samantha Nar/CBC)

A consumer advocate and lawyer says Enterprise and other car rental giants give the impression there's no downside to dropping off a vehicle after hours.

"We've all been there the car company says, 'No problem, stick the keys through the slot in the door,'" said Jennifer Marston, who works with the free legal clinicPro Bono Ontario.

"But how many times do they say to you, 'If anything happens when the car is parked on the lot, you're responsible'? That's never happened to me."

'Just put the keys through the drop off slot'

Wardlaw says when he arrived to pick up the truck, there was little discussion about the terms and conditions in the 30-page (English and French) contract.

"They told me that since they were going to be closed at 12 o'clock that day and I would be returning at around 1p.m., to just put the keys through the drop off slot when I returned the vehicle," he said.

Marston says big car rental outfits can't hide behind lengthy contracts they know most people won't read and may not understand when they contain ambiguous or unusual terms.

The rental contracts for Canada's three biggest vehicle rental companies all contain similar clauses; claiming drivers are responsible for any damage or theft from the time they drop off a vehicle until it is checked back in. (Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg)

"They wrote it. They had the opportunity to put more effort into making it clear and they didn't," she said.

She says legal precedent exists due to an Ontario case which foundTilden Rent-A-Car was required to bring unexpected terms to the attention of the consumer if it wants them to be enforceable.

"When there's an onerous term in the contract, a heavy term that puts a big burden on someone, if it's buried in the fine print, then the company in a consumer transaction like this has the responsibility to bring that to the consumer's attention," said Marston.

Thecompanies also have to meet a standard of proof whenholding customers responsible for damage, said Marston.

When Enterprise told Wardlaw a thief had stolen that catalytic converter, it sent photographs of the damage, but they weren't time-stamped.

"We don't know when those photos were taken," said Marston.

Lawyer Jennifer Marston of Pro Bono Ontario says car rental companies are required to point out unexpected clauses in the fine print to their customers. (Samantha Nar/CBC)

"Maybe they were taken a week later. The burden is on the company to prove that."

She sayspeople caught in a dispute need to know one thing the rental company isn't the judge.

"They will send you a letter saying you've caused this damage, you owe this amount of money. But they're actually not the ones who get to decide that," said Marston.

"That's just their position as one of the parties to a legal claim. And you have the opportunity to respond,"she said, with the understanding that the matter might end with a collection agency or small claims court.

Go Public has learned that the same Enterprise location in north Toronto had half a dozen catalytic converters worth $24,000 stolen from its trucks shortly after Wardlaw'sincident.

  • Read statsabout the growing problem of catalytic converter thefts

The company declined to say what it is doing to prevent further thefts and damage.

Marston says the companies should ensure their vehicles are being stored under safe conditions.

"The rental company could secure the perimeter. They could install security cameras. They can install anti-theft devices on vehicles," she said.

"These options aren't available to the consumers, so why should the consumer bear the loss?"

'This is absolute BS'

Stuti Narula ofToronto says an Enterprise employee also told her to drop off the keys when she returned acar after hours, to a location in the city's north endlast December.

The next day, an Enterprise employee called to say she was responsible for a scratch on its passenger door and owed $1,000.

Narula says the car was in perfect condition when she returned it, but as with Wardlaw an employee said she wasliable for any damages incurred before it was checked back in and that the matter would be sent to a collection agency if she didn't pay up.

"This is absolute BS," said Narula. "If I have to be held liable for any damages to the car, I might as well keep it in my careful custody until the office opens the next day."

She says the drop-offlocation had closed-circuit cameras, but she was told she couldn't see footage.

WATCH |Enterprise charges customer more than $3Kfor damages incurred after truck returned:

Man charged $3,300 for damage after rental truck returned | Go Public

3 years ago
Duration 2:10
A Toronto man was charged over $3,300 by Enterprise when a rental truck he returned after hours had its catalytic converter stolen. CBCs Go Public investigated the clause in most rental contracts that makes the renter responsible when a vehicle is returned after hours.

Narula also says she was told the damage was discovered after an employee drove the car to a car wash and she questioned whether that's when the damage occurred.

"I'm entitled to know what investigation Enterprise carried out at its end before slamming the damage cost on me," Narula wrote in an email to the car rental giant.

After fighting Enterprise for several months, Narula reluctantly asked her car insurance company to submit a payment, but she's sworn off ever renting from Enterprise again.

Enterprise wrote in an email to Go Public that allowing customers to return vehicles after hours is a "convenience" and that "it is important to understand that the rental transaction is not complete until the vehicle has been inspected."

Wardlaw says he's relieved he's no longer expected to pay his damage bill,but says Enterprise has lost him as a customer, too.

"Basically, from the moment I called them, they were arguing with me. I didn't feel that there was any interest in resolution other than to have me pay the full amount."


Protect yourself 'after hours'

  • Ideally, return your vehicle during operating hours and have an agent check it over and sign off on rental.
  • If you must drop off the vehicle after hours, note whether there are security cameras on the lot and try to park within view.
  • Set your smartphone to add a date and time stamp to photos and take pictures of the sides, front, back and roof of vehicle and if possible the underside, wheel wells, interior and trunk.
  • Take a photo of the mileage on the odometer.
  • Hold onto photos for at least six months.

Submit your story ideas

Go Public is an investigative news segment on CBC-TV, radio and the web.

We tell your stories, shed light on wrongdoing and hold the powers that be accountable.

If you have a story in the public interest, or if you're an insider with information, contact GoPublic@cbc.ca with your name, contact information and a brief summary. All emails are confidential until you decide to Go Public.

Follow @CBCGoPublic on Twitter.

Read more stories by Go Public.

With files by Enza Uda